Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20033252›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of public health2010

Workplace smoking restrictions: smoking behavior and the intention to change among continuing smokers.

Jeannette Rüge, Anja Broda, Sabina Ulbricht, Gudrun Klein, Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Ulrich John, Christian Meyer

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of public health, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannette RügeInstitute for Epidemiology and Social Medicine, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-University Greifswald, Walther-Rathenau-Straße 48, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
Anja Broda
Sabina Ulbricht
Gudrun Klein
Hans-Jürgen Rumpf
Ulrich John
Christian Meyer
Universität Greifswald · DELeipzig University · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn this study, the association between three levels of workplace smoking restrictions and smoking behavior and variables related to the intention to quit among continuing smokers was examined.

methodsAdult smokers were recruited from consecutive patients attending a random sample of 34 general medical practices from a pre-defined, north-eastern German region. Self-reported data were gathered in the waiting room by questionnaire. Cross-sectional data of 1,012 employees were analyzed using ordered logistic regression analyses.

resultsAmong the sample, 12% reported a smoke-free workplace, 51% had partial, and 37% no smoking restrictions. Daily cigarette consumption was lower when there were higher levels of restriction. No association was found between smoking restrictions and previous attempts to quit, nicotine dependence, or indicators of adjusted inhalation to compensate for the lower number of cigarettes (e.g. puffs per cigarette, darker coloring of filter). Smoking restrictions were positively associated with single psychological measures related to the intention to quit.

conclusionEmployees who continue to smoke may benefit from workplace smoking restrictions in terms of reduced, active smoke exposure and psychological effects increasing their readiness to quit.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorIntentionOrganizational PolicySmokingWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleOccupational HealthRegression AnalysisSmoking CessationTobacco Smoke PollutionYoung AdultTobacco Smoke Pollution

Identifiers

PMID20033252
OpenAlexW1517014428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.