Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20033225›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2010

Rituximab in refractory nephrotic syndrome.

Agnieszka Prytuła, Kazumoto Iijima, Koichi Kamei, Denis Geary, Errol Gottlich, Abdul Majeed, Mark Taylor, Stephen D Marks, Shamir Tuchman, Roberta Camilla and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Rituximab in children with resistant idiopathic nephrotic syndrome.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2012
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Rituximab for refractory cases of childhood nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2011
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Prophylactic treatment of FSGS recurrence in patients who relapsed on a previous kidney graft.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Update on the treatment of steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Agnieszka PrytułaDepartment of Paediatric Nephrology, Great Ormond Street Hospital-NHS Trust, London, UK.
Kazumoto Iijima
Koichi Kamei
Denis Geary
Errol Gottlich
Abdul Majeed
Mark Taylor
Stephen D Marks
Shamir Tuchman
Roberta Camilla
Milos Ognjanovic
Guido Filler
Graham Smith
Kjell Tullus
University College London · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USChildren's Hospital of Western Ontario · CADubai Hospital · AEGreat Ormond Street Hospital · GBHospital for Sick Children · CAKobe University · JPNational Center For Child Health and Development · JPOspedale Regina Margherita · ITRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBUniversity Hospital of Wales · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to establish the efficacy and safety of rituximab in refractory nephrotic syndrome (NS). Members of the International Paediatric Nephrology Association were asked to retrospectively fill in a questionnaire with details on the use of rituximab in their centres. We divided the data into three groups: group 1, patients with steroid-dependent and frequently relapsing NS; group 2, with steroid-resistant NS; group 3, with post-transplant recurrence of NS. Seventy questionnaires from 25 centres described the outcome of 28, 27 and 15 patients in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Of these, 82% of patients in group 1, 44% of patients in group 2 and 60% of patients in group 3 had a good initial response. Side effects were observed in 27% of the patients, and these were mostly acute reactions. We present a large multicentre series of children with refractory NS. Children in group 1 showed the best response. The good initial response in group 3 can be biased by the accompanying treatments that were administered at the same time as rituximab. Controlled prospective trials are required to establish the value of rituximab in idiopathic NS.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge of OnsetAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsB-LymphocytesChildChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug ResistanceFemaleGlomerulosclerosis, Focal SegmentalHumansImmunoglobulin GInfantKidney TransplantationAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsImmunoglobulin GRituximab

Identifiers

PMID20033225
OpenAlexW2003950996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.