ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2010
Haplotype block: a new type of forensic DNA markers.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.
- Developmental and validation of a novel small and high-efficient panel of microhaplotypes for forensic genetics by the next generation sequencing.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Enhanced mixture interpretation with macrohaplotypes based on long-read DNA sequencing.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Multi-InDel Analysis for Ancestry Inference of Sub-Populations in China.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Detecting a hierarchical genetic population structure via Multi-InDel markers on the X chromosome.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Mini-haplotypes as lineage informative SNPs and ancestry inference SNPs.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2012Article
- Isothermal discrimination of single-nucleotide polymorphisms via real-time kinetic desorption and label-free detection of DNA using silicon photonic microring resonator arrays.Analytical chemistry · 2011Article
- Assessment of DNA degradation and the genotyping success of highly degraded samples.International journal of legal medicine · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Forensic DNA analysis is currently performed using highly discriminating short tandem repeat (STR) markers. SNPs are being investigated as adjunct tools for human identity testing because of their abundance in the human genome, utility for genotyping degraded DNA samples, and amenability to automation. While SNPs can provide an alternative approach, on a per locus basis they have a lower power of discrimination (PD) than STRs. With the discovery of block structures in the human genome, a novel set of SNP markers are available for further exploration of forensic utility. Several neighboring, tightly linked SNPs are inherited together and form a haplotype block, which as a haploblock has a higher discrimination power than the individual SNPs within the block. Candidate haplotype blocks were selected from three major populations (Caucasian, East Asian, and African) using the following parameters: maximum match probability reduction = 0.85, linkage disequilibrium (LD) r(2) ≥ 0.7, maximum F(st) = 0.06, minimum number of SNPs = 3, minimum heterozygosity = 0.2, and minimum number of haplotypes = 3. From the HapMap Phase II data, 253 haploblocks were identified on the 22 autosomal chromosomes. After removing haploblocks deviating from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) or in LD with other haploblocks, 24 haploblocks remained as candidates for forensic consideration. The cumulative PD of these blocks can reach 10(-12) in the populations studied. The data support within and between haplotype independence even when they are syntenic. We propose guidelines for evidence interpretation that address the application of haplotype blocks for transfer evidence, mixture, and kinship analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.