Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20033183›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2010

A method for mapping intralocus interactions influencing excessive alcohol drinking.

Tamara J Phillips, Cheryl Reed, Sue Burkhart-Kasch, Na Li, Robert Hitzemann, Chia-Hua Yu, Lauren L Brown, Melinda L Helms, John C Crabbe, John K Belknap

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Animal Models of Excessive Alcohol Consumption in Rodents.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Oral Nicotine Self-Administration in Rodents.Journal of addiction research & therapy · 2012
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Preclinical studies of alcohol binge drinking.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2011
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tamara J PhillipsVeterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland Alcohol Research Center, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA. phillipt@ohsu.edu
Cheryl Reed
Sue Burkhart-Kasch
Na Li
Robert Hitzemann
Chia-Hua Yu
Lauren L Brown
Melinda L Helms
John C Crabbe
John K Belknap

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Suzanne S. Fei · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Neurocircuitry Mapping and Genotyping CoreU01AA013484 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HITZEMANN, ROBERT J. · 2001 to 2021
$6.2M
Mapping and Microarray Gene Expression Analysis in a Model of Excessive DrinkingU01AA016655 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2006 to 2010
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA013484NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016655
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive alcohol (ethanol) consumption is the hallmark of alcohol use disorders. The F1 hybrid cross between the C57BL/6J (B6) and FVB/NJ (FVB) inbred mouse strains consumes more ethanol than either progenitor strain. The purpose of this study was to utilize ethanol-drinking data and genetic information to map genes that result in overdominant (or heterotic) ethanol drinking. About 600 B6 x FVB F2 mice, half of each sex, were tested for ethanol intake and preference in a 24-h, two-bottle water versus ethanol choice procedure, with ascending ethanol concentrations. They were then tested for ethanol intake in a Drinking in the Dark (DID) procedure, first when there was no water choice and then when ethanol was offered versus water. DNA samples were obtained and genome-wide QTL analyses were performed to search for single QTLs (both additive and dominance effects) and interactions between pairs of QTLs, or epistasis. On average, F2 mice consumed excessive amounts of ethanol in the 24-h choice procedure, consistent with high levels of consumption seen in the F1 cross. Consumption in the DID procedure was similar or higher than amounts reported previously for the B6 progenitor. QTLs resulting in heightened consumption in heterozygous compared to homozygous animals were found on Chrs 11, 15, and 16 for 24-h choice 30% ethanol consumption, and on Chr 11 for DID. No evidence was found for epistasis between any pair of significant or suggestive QTLs. This indicates that the hybrid overdominance is due to intralocus interactions at the level of individual QTL.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismAnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorChromosome MappingCrosses, GeneticDarknessEpistasis, GeneticFemaleGenetic LociMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID20033183
PMCPMC2850100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.