Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20032241›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2010

Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Osmar Pinto Neto, Evangelos A Christou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Multimodal neuroimaging of fatigability development.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Sensory tricks modulate corticocortical and corticomuscular connectivity in cervical dystonia.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Abnormal patterns of corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence in childhood dystonia.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Osmar Pinto NetoDepartment of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243, USA.
Evangelos A Christou

Funding

Aging and learning of novel fine motor tasksR01AG031769 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHRISTOU, EVANGELOS A · 2008 to 2012
$1.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG-031769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectification of EMG signals is a common processing step used when performing electroencephalographic-electromyographic (EEG-EMG) coherence and EMG-EMG coherence. It is well known, however, that EMG rectification alters the power spectrum of the recorded EMG signal (interference EMG). The purpose of this study was to determine whether rectification of the EMG signal influences the capability of capturing the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillations between two EMG signals. Several EMG signals were reconstructed from experimentally recorded EMG signals from the surface of the first dorsal interosseus muscle and were manipulated to have an oscillatory input or common input (for pairs of reconstructed EMG signals) at various frequency bands (in Hz: 0-12, 12-30, 30-50, 50-100, 100-150, 150-200, 200-250, 250-300, and 300-400), one at a time. The absolute integral and normalized integral of power, peak power, and peak coherence (for pairs of EMG signals) were quantified from each frequency band. The power spectrum of the interference EMG accurately detected the changes to the oscillatory input to the reconstructed EMG signal, whereas the power spectrum of the rectified EMG did not. Similarly, the EMG-EMG coherence between two interference EMG signals accurately detected the common input to the pairs of reconstructed EMG signals, whereas the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified EMG signals did not. The frequency band from 12 to 30 Hz in the power spectrum of the rectified EMG and the EMG-EMG coherence between two rectified signals was influenced by the input from 100 to 150 Hz but not from the input from 12 to 30 Hz. The study concludes that the power spectrum of the EMG and EMG-EMG coherence should be performed on interference EMG signals and not on rectified EMG signals because rectification impairs the identification of the oscillatory input to a single EMG signal and the common oscillatory input between two EMG signals.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAction PotentialsAdultAlgorithmsArtifactsBiological ClocksElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalOscillometryReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID20032241
PMCPMC2822682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.