Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20031889›Full record

Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2009

A randomized clinical trial to reduce patient prehospital delay to treatment in acute coronary syndrome.

Kathleen Dracup, Sharon McKinley, Barbara Riegel, Debra K Moser, Hendrika Meischke, Lynn V Doering, Patricia Davidson, Steven M Paul, Heather Baker, Michele Pelter

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00734760 (Reducing Prehospital Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00734760 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing Prehospital Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2001 to 2006Enrolled3,522ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmseducation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Kathleen DracupUniversity of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. kathy.dracup@nursing.ucsf.edu
Sharon McKinley
Barbara Riegel
Debra K Moser
Hendrika Meischke
Lynn V Doering
Patricia Davidson
Steven M Paul
Heather Baker
Michele Pelter
University of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Reducing Prehospital Delay Acute Myocardial InfarctionR01NR007952 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI DRACUP, KATHLEEN A · 2001 to 2005
$2.5M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR007952NINR NIH HHS R01 NR05323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDelay from onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms to hospital admission continues to be prolonged. To date, community education campaigns on the topic have had disappointing results. Therefore, we conducted a clinical randomized trial to test whether an intervention tailored specifically for patients with ACS and delivered one-on-one would reduce prehospital delay time. METHODS AND

resultsParticipants (n=3522) with documented coronary heart disease were randomized to experimental (n=1777) or control (n=1745) groups. Experimental patients received education and counseling about ACS symptoms and actions required. Patients had a mean age of 67+/-11 years, and 68% were male. Over the 2 years of follow-up, 565 patients (16.0%) were admitted to an emergency department with ACS symptoms a total of 842 times. Neither median prehospital delay time (experimental, 2.20 versus control, 2.25 hours) nor emergency medical system use (experimental, 63.6% versus control, 66.9%) was different between groups, although experimental patients were more likely than control to call the emergency medical system if the symptoms occurred within the first 6 months following the intervention (P=0.036). Experimental patients were significantly more likely to take aspirin after symptom onset than control patients (experimental, 22.3% versus control, 10.1%, P=0.02). The intervention did not result in an increase in emergency department use (experimental, 14.6% versus control, 17.5%).

conclusionsThe education and counseling intervention did not lead to reduced prehospital delay or increased ambulance use. Reducing the time from onset of ACS symptoms to arrival at the hospital continues to be a significant public health challenge. CLINICAL

trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT00734760.

Indexed as

CounselingPatient Education as TopicAcute Coronary SyndromeAgedAged, 80 and overAspirinAustraliaEmergency Medical ServicesEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNew ZealandPatient AdmissionAspirinPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20031889
PMCPMC2802063
OpenAlexW2117999649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.