Trial reportCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2009
A randomized clinical trial to reduce patient prehospital delay to treatment in acute coronary syndrome.
Trial report in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00734760 (Reducing Prehospital Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Reducing Prehospital Delay in Acute Myocardial Infarction
Who cites it
51 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions to increase patient and family involvement in escalation of care for acute life-threatening illness in community health and hospital settings.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- A systematic review of educational interventions aiming to reduce prehospital delay in patients with acute coronary syndrome.Open heart · 2020Pooled it
- Patient education in the management of coronary heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Reducing the time-lag between onset of chest pain and seeking professional medical help: a theory-based review.BMC medical research methodology · 2013Pooled it
- Age and sex differences in duration of prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2010Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effect of education using the interactive avatar application on self-care and the ability to identify and respond to the symptoms of heart attack in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a randomized clinical trial.BMC health services research · 2025Trial
- Reducing patient delay in acute coronary syndrome: Randomized controlled trial testing effect of behaviour change intervention on intentions to seek help.British journal of health psychology · 2023Trial
- Effects of a Narrative-Based Psychoeducational Intervention to Prepare Patients for Responding to Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2022Trial
- The impact on anxiety and perceived control of a short one-on-one nursing intervention designed to decrease treatment seeking delay in people with coronary heart disease.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2012Trial
- Who listens to our advice? A secondary analysis of data from a clinical trial testing an intervention designed to decrease delay in seeking treatment for acute coronary syndrome.Patient education and counseling · 2011Trial
- Differences in mortality in acute coronary syndrome symptom clusters.American heart journal · 2010Trial
- The effect of a short one-on-one nursing intervention on knowledge, attitudes and beliefs related to response to acute coronary syndrome in people with coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial.International journal of nursing studies · 2009Trial
- Association of Symptoms and Mode of Transportation to Emergency Department in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome.Dimensions of critical care nursing : DCCNTrial
- Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Self-Transport Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Analysis.Circulation reports · 2026Article
- Analysis of prehospital delay in acute ischaemic stroke and its influencing factors: a multicentre prospective case registry study in China.Stroke and vascular neurology · 2025Article
- Gender disparities in the mediating role of symptom knowledge level in reducing acute coronary syndrome (ACS) decision delay: Findings from a community-based study in China.BMC emergency medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges.Clinics and practice · 2023Review
- Sex Differences in Prehospital Delays in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Article
- Variation and Disparities in Awareness of Myocardial Infarction Symptoms Among Adults in the United States.JAMA network open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDelay from onset of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) symptoms to hospital admission continues to be prolonged. To date, community education campaigns on the topic have had disappointing results. Therefore, we conducted a clinical randomized trial to test whether an intervention tailored specifically for patients with ACS and delivered one-on-one would reduce prehospital delay time. METHODS AND
resultsParticipants (n=3522) with documented coronary heart disease were randomized to experimental (n=1777) or control (n=1745) groups. Experimental patients received education and counseling about ACS symptoms and actions required. Patients had a mean age of 67+/-11 years, and 68% were male. Over the 2 years of follow-up, 565 patients (16.0%) were admitted to an emergency department with ACS symptoms a total of 842 times. Neither median prehospital delay time (experimental, 2.20 versus control, 2.25 hours) nor emergency medical system use (experimental, 63.6% versus control, 66.9%) was different between groups, although experimental patients were more likely than control to call the emergency medical system if the symptoms occurred within the first 6 months following the intervention (P=0.036). Experimental patients were significantly more likely to take aspirin after symptom onset than control patients (experimental, 22.3% versus control, 10.1%, P=0.02). The intervention did not result in an increase in emergency department use (experimental, 14.6% versus control, 17.5%).
conclusionsThe education and counseling intervention did not lead to reduced prehospital delay or increased ambulance use. Reducing the time from onset of ACS symptoms to arrival at the hospital continues to be a significant public health challenge. CLINICAL
trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov. Identifier NCT00734760.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.