ArticleCirculation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes2009
Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided warfarin dosing for patients with atrial fibrillation.
Article in Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 110 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2022Pooled it
- Pharmacogenetic testing for adverse drug reaction prevention: systematic review of economic evaluations and the appraisal of quality matters for clinical practice and implementation.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Pooled it
- Accounting for Capacity Constraints in Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Prevention of Adverse Drug Reactions.PharmacoEconomics · 2016Pooled it
- Economic Evaluations of Pharmacogenetic and Pharmacogenomic Screening Tests: A Systematic Review. Second Update of the Literature.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Genotype-Guided vs Standard Dosing of Warfarin.Chest · 2015Pooled it
- Guideline
- Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenomics: a critical and systematic review.PharmacoEconomics · 2010Pooled it
- Subgroup analysis of genotype guided vs traditional warfarin dosing in Asian patients from an open label randomized trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Pharmacogenetic guided versus standard warfarin dosing for routine clinical care with its pharmacoeconomic impact: a randomized controlled clinical trial.Annals of hematology · 2024Trial
- De-risking Atrial Fibrillation: Refining Anticoagulation Decision-Making.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness of genotype-guided acenocoumarol therapy in atrial fibrillation: a pharmacogenomic simulation study in the chilean population.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pharmacogenomics-Guided Treatment in Cardiovascular Disease: An Umbrella Review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Cost-effectiveness of CYP2C19-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention informed by real-world data.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2020Article
- Optimizing quality care for the oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs).Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2018Review
- Benefit of Preemptive Pharmacogenetic Information on Clinical Outcome.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2018Review
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of patient self-testing therapy of oral anticoagulation.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2018Article
- Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic-guided treatment: are we there yet?The pharmacogenomics journal · 2017Review
- Cost-Utility Study of Warfarin Genotyping in the VACHS Affiliated Anticoagulation Clinic of Puerto Rico.Puerto Rico health sciences journal · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotyping has been advocated as a means of improving the accuracy of warfarin dosing. However, the effectiveness of genotyping in improving anticoagulation control and reducing major bleeding has not yet been compellingly demonstrated. Genotyping currently costs $400 to $550. METHODS AND
resultsWe constructed a Markov model to evaluate whether and under what circumstances genetically-guided warfarin dosing could be cost-effective for newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation patients. Estimates of clinical event rates, treatment and adverse event costs, and utilities for health states were derived from the published literature. The cost-effectiveness of genetically-guided dosing was highly dependent on the assumed effectiveness of genotyping in increasing the amount of time patients spend appropriately anticoagulated. If genotyping increases the time spent in the target international normalized ratio range by <5 percentage points, its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio would be greater than $100,000 per quality-adjusted life year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio falls below $50,000 per quality-adjusted life year if genotyping increases the time spent in range by 9 percentage points. The results were also sensitive to assumptions about the rate of major bleeding events during treatment initiation and the cost of the test.
conclusionsOur results suggest that genotyping before warfarin initiation will be cost-effective for patients with atrial fibrillation only if it reduces out-of-range international normalized ratio values by more than 5 to 9 percentage points compared with usual care. Given the current uncertainty surrounding genotyping efficacy, caution should be taken in advocating the widespread adoption of this strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.