Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20031220›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology2010

Detection of bacterial endosymbionts in clinical acanthamoeba isolates.

Alfonso Iovieno, Dolena R Ledee, Darlene Miller, Eduardo C Alfonso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Implication of Horizontal Gene Transfer BetweenPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Oxidative Stress and Redox Imbalance inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Fungal keratitis complicating the diagnosis ofMedical mycology case reports · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alfonso IovienoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA.
Dolena R Ledee
Darlene Miller
Eduardo C Alfonso

Funding

Shared Equipment ModuleP30EY014801 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI Victor L Perez · 2004 to 2026
$12.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014801NEI NIH HHS P30: EY014801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the presence of 4 clinically relevant bacterial endosymbionts in Acanthamoeba isolates obtained from patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) and the possible contribution of endosymbionts to the pathogenesis of AK.

designExperimental study.

participantsAcanthamoeba isolates (N = 37) recovered from the cornea and contact lens paraphernalia of 23 patients with culture-proven AK and 1 environmental isolate.

methodsAcanthamoeba isolates were evaluated for the presence of microbial endosymbionts belonging to the bacterial genera Legionella, Pseudomonas, Mycobacterium, and Chlamydia using molecular techniques (polymerase chain reaction and sequence analysis, fluorescence in situ hybridization) and transmission electron microscopy. Corneal toxicity and virulence of Acanthamoeba isolates with and without endosymbionts were compared using a cytopathic effect (CPE) assay on human corneal epithelial cells in vitro. Initial visual acuity, location and characteristics of the infiltrate, time to detection of the infection, and symptom duration at presentation were evaluated in all patients.

main outcome measuresPrevalence and potential pathobiology of bacterial endosymbionts detected in Acanthamoeba isolates recovered from AK.

resultsTwenty-two (59.4%) of the 38 cultures examined contained at least 1 bacterial endosymbiont. One isolate contained 2 endosymbionts, Legionella and Chlamydia, confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Corneal toxicity (CPE) was significantly higher for Acanthamoeba-hosting endosymbionts compared with isolates without endosymbionts (P<0.05). Corneal pathogenic endosymbionts such as Pseudomonas and Mycobacterium enhanced Acanthamoeba CPE significantly more than Legionella (P<0.05). In the presence of bacterial endosymbionts, there was a trend toward worse initial visual acuity (P>0.05), central location (P<0.05), absence of radial perineuritis (P<0.05), delayed time to detection (P>0.05), and longer symptom duration at presentation (P>0.05).

conclusionsMost Acanthamoeba isolates responsible for AK harbor 1 or more bacterial endosymbionts. The presence of endosymbionts enhances the corneal pathogenicity of Acanthamoeba isolates and may impact detection time and clinical features of AK.

Indexed as

AcanthamoebaAcanthamoeba KeratitisAnimalsChlamydiaContact LensesCorneaDNA, BacterialGenotypeHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLegionellaMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionMycobacteriumPolymerase Chain ReactionPseudomonasSymbiosisDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID20031220
PMCPMC2830310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.