Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20030661›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2010

Experimental hookworm infection: a randomized placebo-controlled trial in asthma.

J R Feary, A J Venn, K Mortimer, A P Brown, D Hooi, F H Falcone, D I Pritchard, J R Britton

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Helminth therapy (worms) for allergic rhinitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Isolation ofF1000Research · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J R FearyDivision of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
A J Venn
K Mortimer
A P Brown
D Hooi
F H Falcone
D I Pritchard
J R Britton
University of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust GR065978MAWellcome Trust GR076306/2/04/2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEpidemiological studies suggest that hookworm infection protects against asthma, and therefore that hookworm infection may have a direct or an indirect therapeutic potential in this disease. We now report the first clinical trial of experimental hookworm infection in people with allergic asthma.

objectivesTo determine the effects of experimental hookworm infection in asthma.

methodsThirty-two individuals with asthma and measurable airway responsiveness to adenosine monophosphate (AMP) were randomized and double blinded to cutaneous administration of either ten Necator americanus larvae, or histamine solution (placebo), and followed for 16 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in provocation dose of inhaled AMP required to reduce forced expiratory volume in 1 s by 20% (PD(20)AMP) from baseline to week 16. Secondary outcomes included change in several measures of asthma control and allergen skin sensitivity and the occurrence of adverse effects.

resultsMean PD(20)AMP improved in both groups, more in the hookworm [1.49 doubling doses (DD)] than the placebo group (0.98 DD), but the difference between groups was not significant (0.51 DD; 95% confidence interval: -1.79 to 2.80; P=0.65). There were no significant differences between the two groups for other measures of asthma control or allergen skin sensitization. Infection was generally well tolerated.

conclusionsExperimental infection with ten hookworm larvae in asthma did not result in significant improvement in bronchial responsiveness or other measures of asthma control in this study. However, infection was well tolerated and resulted in a non-significant improvement in airway responsiveness, indicating that further studies that mimic more closely natural infection are feasible and should be undertaken.

Indexed as

Necator americanusAdenosine MonophosphateAdministration, InhalationAdultAnimalsAsthmaBronchial Provocation TestsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLarvaMaleNecatoriasisPlacebosSafetyAdenosine MonophosphatePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID20030661
PMCPMC2814083
OpenAlexW2072129671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.