Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20030433›Full record

ArticleDrugs & aging2010

Differential impact of NSAIDs on rate of adverse events that require hospitalization in high-risk and general veteran populations: a retrospective cohort study.

Nicole Pratt, Elizabeth E Roughead, Philip Ryan, Andrew L Gilbert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs & aging, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and osteoarthritis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Year in review: medication mishaps in the elderly.The American journal of geriatric pharmacotherapy · 2011
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicole PrattData Management and Analysis Centre, Discipline of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia. nicole.pratt@adelaide.edu.au
Elizabeth E Roughead
Philip Ryan
Andrew L Gilbert
University of Adelaide · AUUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany observational studies in the general population have demonstrated an increased risk of adverse events associated with NSAIDs, including gastrointestinal bleeds, congestive heart failure, acute renal failure, hypertension and acute myocardial infarction. Few studies, however, have explored outcomes in populations considered to be more vulnerable to their effects.

objectiveTo determine the rate of adverse events requiring hospitalization that are associated with NSAIDs in two high-risk veteran populations and the general veteran population.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, we identified veterans being dispensed medicines for diabetes mellitus (diabetes cohort), those receiving renin-angiotensin system medicines and frusemide (furosemide) concurrently (ACE inhibitors/angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists [angiotensin receptor blockers; ARBs] and frusemide cohort), or at least one other medicine (general population/reference cohort). The primary endpoint was hospitalization with a primary diagnosis of congestive heart failure, gastrointestinal ulcer, acute renal failure, acute myocardial infarction or hypertension. Hospitalization rates during the period of non-exposure and the 30-day period after a subject was first dispensed an NSAID were compared using Poisson regression.

resultsThere was a significant increase in risk of all hospitalizations of interest in the exposed period compared with the unexposed period in the diabetes cohort (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.31; 95% CI 1.08, 1.60), ACE inhibitor/ARB and frusemide cohort (IRR 1.34; 95% CI 1.13, 1.58) and reference cohort (IRR 1.47; 95% CI 1.30, 1.66). The incidence rates demonstrate that for every 10,000 veterans treated for 30 days with NSAIDs, there were 20 extra hospitalizations in the diabetes population, 30 additional hospitalizations in the ACE inhibitor/ARB and frusemide cohort and 6 extra hospitalizations in the reference population compared with those not treated with NSAIDs.

conclusionsNSAID use is associated with an increased risk of hospitalization in all groups, with similar risk ratio estimates. However, the clinical implications were greater in the high-risk populations, in which more hospitalizations were observed. Consideration may need to be given to differential presentation of risk information to clinicians.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalCohort StudiesDrug InteractionsFemaleFurosemideHeart FailureHospitalizationHumansMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicRenin-Angiotensin SystemAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAntihypertensive AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFurosemide

Identifiers

PMID20030433
OpenAlexW1989938259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.