ArticleMolecular vision2009
Outcome of ABCA4 microarray screening in routine clinical practice.
Article in Molecular vision, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Overview of the Genetics ofGenes · 2021Review
- Genetic investigation of 211 Chinese families expands the mutational and phenotypical spectra of hereditary retinopathy genes through targeted sequencing technology.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Long-Range PCR-Based NGS Applications to Diagnose Mendelian Retinal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Genetic characterization of Stargardt clinical phenotype in South Indian patients using sanger and targeted sequencing.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2020Article
- Expanding the Mutation Spectrum inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018Article
- Mutation Spectrum of theJournal of ophthalmology · 2018Article
- Stargardt disease: clinical features, molecular genetics, animal models and therapeutic options.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2017Review
- Genomic screening of ABCA4 and array CGH analysis underline the genetic variability of Greek patients with inherited retinal diseases.Meta gene · 2016Article
- Novel compound heterozygous mutations inMolecular vision · 2016Article
- Comprehensive analysis of patients with Stargardt macular dystrophy reveals new genotype-phenotype correlations and unexpected diagnostic revisions.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015Article
- ABCA4 gene screening by next-generation sequencing in a British cohort.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2013Article
- Clinical phenotypes and prognostic full-field electroretinographic findings in Stargardt disease.American journal of ophthalmology · 2013Article
- Dawn of ocular gene therapy: implications for molecular diagnosis in retinal disease.Science China. Life sciences · 2013Review
- Microarray-based mutation detection and phenotypic characterization in Korean patients with retinitis pigmentosa.Molecular vision · 2012Article
- Analysis of the ABCA4 gene by next-generation sequencing.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011Article
- Retinitis pigmentosa and allied conditions today: a paradigm of translational research.Genome medicine · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo retrospectively analyze the clinical characteristics of patients who were screened for mutations with the ATP-binding cassette transporter gene ABCA4 (ABCA4) microarray in a routine clinical DNA diagnostics setting.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the medical charts of 65 patients who underwent an ABCA4 microarray screening between the years 2002 and 2006. An additional denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was performed in these patients if less than two mutations were found with the microarray. We included all patients who were suspected of autosomal recessive Stargardt disease (STGD1), autosomal recessive cone-rod dystrophy (arCRD), or autosomal recessive retinitis pigmentosa at the time of microarray request. After a retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics, the patients who were suspected of STGD1 were categorized as having either a typical or atypical form of STGD1, according to the age at onset, fundus appearance, fluorescein angiography, and electroretinography. The occurrence of typical clinical features for STGD1 was compared between patients with different numbers of discovered mutations.
resultsOf the 44 patients who were suspected of STGD1, 26 patients (59%) had sufficient data available for a classification in either typical (six patients; 23%) or atypical (20 patients; 77%) STGD1. In the suspected STGD1 group, 59% of all expected pathogenic alleles were found with the ABCA4 microarray. DGGE led to the finding of 12 more mutations, resulting in an overall detection rate of 73%. Thirty-one percent of patients with two or three discovered ABCA4 mutations met all typical STGD1 criteria. An age at onset younger than 25 years and a dark choroid on fluorescein angiography were the most predictive clinical features to find ABCA4 mutations in patients suspected of STGD1. In 18 patients suspected of arCRD, microarray screening detected 22% of the possible pathogenic alleles.
conclusionsIn addition to confirmation of the diagnosis in typical STGD1, ABCA4 microarray screening is usually requested in daily clinical practice to strengthen the diagnosis when the disease is atypical. This study supports the view that the efficiency and accuracy of ABCA4 microarray screening are directly dependent upon the clinical features of the patients who are screened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20029649PMC2796636W2114591408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.