Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20029448›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Immunology2010

Pairing computation with experimentation: a powerful coupling for understanding T cell signalling.

Arup K Chakraborty, Jayajit Das

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Origin of the clock inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Mathematics in modern immunology.Interface focus · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Signal transduction: From the atomic age to the post-genomic era.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2014
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Modeling the T cell immune response: a fascinating challenge.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2014
    Review
  13. Changing face of vaccination in immunocompromised hosts.Current infectious disease reports · 2014
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A stochastic T cell response criterion.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Arup K ChakrabortyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. arupc@mit.edu
Jayajit Das

Funding

Visualizing, Quantifying, and Modeling of T Cell Response to Listeria InfectionP01AI071195 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUSTIN, MICHAEL LORAN · 2006 to 2010
$8.1M
NIAID NIH HHS 1P01/AI071195/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells are activated when extracellular stimuli, such as a ligand binding to the T cell receptor, are converted into functional outputs by the T cell signalling network. T cell receptor signalling is a highly complex, stochastic and dynamic process involving many interacting proteins. This complexity often confounds intuition, making it difficult to develop mechanistic principles that underly experimental observations. In this Review, we describe how computational approaches can partner successfully with biological experimentation to help address this challenge, and we illustrate this paradigm by summarizing recent work that shows new aspects of the T cell signalling network.

Indexed as

Models, ImmunologicalAnimalsComputational BiologyHumansLymphocyte ActivationReceptors, Antigen, T-CellSignal TransductionStochastic ProcessesT-LymphocytesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID20029448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.