ArticleHuman heredity2010
Multiple subsampling of dense SNP data localizes disease genes with increased precision.
Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A powerful test of independent assortment that determines genome-wide significance quickly and accurately.Heredity · 2016Article
- Next-generation linkage and association methods applied to hypertension: a multifaceted approach to the analysis of sequence data.BMC proceedings · 2014Article
- Increasing the power of association studies with affected families, unrelated cases and controls.Frontiers in genetics · 2013Article
- How should we be searching for genes for common epilepsy? A critique and a prescription.Epilepsia · 2012Review
- Obtaining accurate p values from a dense SNP linkage scan.Human heredity · 2012Article
- Finding disease genes: a fast and flexible approach for analyzing high-throughput data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsCurrent linkage studies detect and localize trait loci using genotypes sampled at hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Such data should provide precise estimates of trait location once linkage has been established. However, correlations between nearby SNPs can distort the information about trait location. Traditionally, when faced with this dilemma, three approaches have been used: (1) ignore the correlation; (2) approximate the correlation; or, (3) analyze a single, approximately uncorrelated subset of the original dense data.
methodsHere, we examine and test a simple and efficient estimator of trait location that averages location estimates across random subsamples of the original dense data. Based on pairwise estimates of correlation, we ensure that the SNPs within each subsample are approximately uncorrelated. In addition, we use the nonparametric bootstrap procedure to compute narrow, high-resolution candidate gene regions (i.e. confidence intervals for the true trait location).
resultsUsing simulated data, we show that the three existing approaches to dense SNP linkage analysis (described above) can yield biased and/or inefficient estimation depending on the underlying correlation structure. With respect to mean squared error, our estimator outperforms the third approach, and is as good as, but usually better than the first and second approaches. Relative to the third approach, our estimator led to a 47.5% reduction in the candidate gene region length based on the analysis of 15 hypertension families genotyped at approximately 500,000 SNPs.
conclusionThe method we developed will be an important tool for constructing high-resolution candidate gene regions that could ultimately aid in targeting regions for sequencing projects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.