Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20029227›Full record

ArticleHuman heredity2010

Multiple subsampling of dense SNP data localizes disease genes with increased precision.

William C L Stewart, Anna L Peljto, David A Greenberg

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human heredity, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William C L StewartColumbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Division of Statistical Genetics, Department of Biostatistics, 722 W. 168th Street, 6th floor, New York, NY 10032, USA. ws2267@columbia.edu
Anna L Peljto
David A Greenberg

Funding

PHS HHS DKO31175PHS HHS DKO31813PHS HHS NLO60056
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsCurrent linkage studies detect and localize trait loci using genotypes sampled at hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Such data should provide precise estimates of trait location once linkage has been established. However, correlations between nearby SNPs can distort the information about trait location. Traditionally, when faced with this dilemma, three approaches have been used: (1) ignore the correlation; (2) approximate the correlation; or, (3) analyze a single, approximately uncorrelated subset of the original dense data.

methodsHere, we examine and test a simple and efficient estimator of trait location that averages location estimates across random subsamples of the original dense data. Based on pairwise estimates of correlation, we ensure that the SNPs within each subsample are approximately uncorrelated. In addition, we use the nonparametric bootstrap procedure to compute narrow, high-resolution candidate gene regions (i.e. confidence intervals for the true trait location).

resultsUsing simulated data, we show that the three existing approaches to dense SNP linkage analysis (described above) can yield biased and/or inefficient estimation depending on the underlying correlation structure. With respect to mean squared error, our estimator outperforms the third approach, and is as good as, but usually better than the first and second approaches. Relative to the third approach, our estimator led to a 47.5% reduction in the candidate gene region length based on the analysis of 15 hypertension families genotyped at approximately 500,000 SNPs.

conclusionThe method we developed will be an important tool for constructing high-resolution candidate gene regions that could ultimately aid in targeting regions for sequencing projects.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGenetic Association StudiesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideDiseaseFamilyGenesGenotypeHumansLinkage DisequilibriumModels, TheoreticalSampling StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID20029227
PMCPMC2918647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.