Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20026616›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2010

Subunit-specific desensitization of heteromeric kainate receptors.

David D Mott, Asheebo Rojas, Janet L Fisher, Raymond J Dingledine, Morris Benveniste

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Kainate Receptor Antagonists: Recent Advances and Therapeutic Perspective.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David D MottDepartment of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Asheebo Rojas
Janet L Fisher
Raymond J Dingledine
Morris Benveniste
Emory University · USUniversity of South Carolina · USMorehouse School of Medicine · US

Funding

GENETIC CONTROL OF GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR FUNCTIONR01NS036604 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DINGLEDINE, RAYMOND J · 1998 to 2008
$3.0M
Subunit dependent properties of kainate receptorsR01NS065869 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI FISHER, JANET L, MOTT, DAVID D · 2009 to 2013
$1.5M
Influence of NMDA Receptors on EPSP Summation in Normal and Epileptic RatsS11NS055883 · NINDS · MOREHOUSE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI BENVENISTE, MORRIS J. · 2007 to 2011
$1.2M
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS065869NINDS NIH HHS 5R01 NS036604NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS036604NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065869NINDS NIH HHS S11 NS055883NINDS NIH HHS S11NS055883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kainate receptor subunits can form functional channels as homomers of GluK1, GluK2 or GluK3, or as heteromeric combinations with each other or incorporating GluK4 or GluK5 subunits. However, GluK4 and GluK5 cannot form functional channels by themselves. Incorporation of GluK4 or GluK5 into a heteromeric complex increases glutamate apparent affinity and also enables receptor activation by the agonist AMPA. Utilizing two-electrode voltage clamp of Xenopus oocytes injected with cRNA encoding kainate receptor subunits, we have observed that heteromeric channels composed of GluK2/GluK4 and GluK2/GluK5 have steady state concentration-response curves that were bell-shaped in response to either glutamate or AMPA. By contrast, homomeric GluK2 channels exhibited a monophasic steady state concentration-response curve that simply plateaued at high glutamate concentrations. By fitting several specific Markov models to GluK2/GluK4 heteromeric and GluK2 homomeric concentration-response data, we have determined that: (a) two strikingly different agonist binding affinities exist; (b) the high-affinity binding site leads to channel opening; and (c) the low-affinity agonist binding site leads to strong desensitization after agonist binding. Model parameters also approximate the onset and recovery kinetics of desensitization observed for macroscopic currents measured from HEK-293 cells expressing GluK2 and GluK4 subunits. The GluK2(E738D) mutation lowers the steady state apparent affinity for glutamate by 9000-fold in comparison to GluK2 homomeric wildtype receptors. When this mutant subunit was expressed with GluK4, the rising phase of the glutamate steady state concentration-response curve overlapped with the wildtype curve, whereas the declining phase was right-shifted toward lower affinity. Taken together, these data are consistent with a scheme whereby high-affinity agonist binding to a non-desensitizing GluK4 subunit opens the heteromeric channel, whereas low-affinity agonist binding to GluK2 desensitizes the whole channel complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesGlutamic AcidKainic Acid ReceptorsMarkov ChainsMembrane PotentialsPatch-Clamp TechniquesProtein SubunitsXenopus laevisGlutamic AcidKainic Acid ReceptorsProtein Subunits

Identifiers

PMID20026616
PMCPMC2828140
OpenAlexW2121605353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.