ArticleJournal of structural biology2010
An automated procedure for detecting protein folds from sub-nanometer resolution electron density.
Article in Journal of structural biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography · 2015Article
- Structural characterization of cleaved, soluble HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein trimers.Journal of virology · 2013Article
- FOLD-EM: automated fold recognition in medium- and low-resolution (4-15 Å) electron density maps.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
- Macromolecular structure modeling from 3D EM using VolRover 2.0.Biopolymers · 2012Review
- Outcome of the first electron microscopy validation task force meeting.Structure (London, England : 1993) · 2012Article
- Detection of secondary and supersecondary structures of proteins from cryo-electron microscopy.Journal of structural biology · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of sub-nanometer resolution electron density as spatial constraints for de novo and ab initio structure prediction requires knowledge of protein boundaries to accurately segment the electron density for the prediction algorithms. Here we present a procedure where even poorly segmented density can be used to determine the fold of the protein. The method is automated, fast, capable of searching for multiple copies of a protein fold, and accessible to densities encompassing more than a thousand residues. The automation is particularly powerful as it allows the procedure to take full advantage of the expanding repository in the Protein Data Bank. We have tested the method on nine segmented sub-nanometer image reconstruction electron densities. The method successfully identifies the correct fold for the six densities for which an atomic structure is known, identifies a fold that agrees with prior structural data, a fold that agrees with predictions from the Fold & Function Assignment server, and a fold that correlates with secondary structure prediction. The identified folds in the last three examples can be used as templates for comparative modeling of the bacteriophage P22 tail-machine (a 3MDa complex composed of 39 protein subunits).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.