Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20026191›Full record

ReviewBrain research reviews2010

How and when the fMRI BOLD signal relates to underlying neural activity: the danger in dissociation.

Arne Ekstrom

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03347084 (Study of Non-Invasive Deep Brain Stimulation with Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulse), which is not on this map. Cited by 157 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
157citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03347084 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Study of Non-Invasive Deep Brain Stimulation with Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Pulse (LIFUP) for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2018 to 2023Enrolled2ConditionsBrain Imaging, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Alzheimer Disease, Deep Brain StimulationArmsExcitation, Inhibition
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

157 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prefrontal Default Mode Network Interactions with Posterior Hippocampus during Exploration.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Brainwide blood volume reflects opposing neural populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Correlation of zero echo time functional MRI with neuronal activity in rats.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

97 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arne EkstromCenter for Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, 1544 Newton Court, Davis, CA 95618, USA. adekstrom@ucdavis.edu <adekstrom@ucdavis.edu>
University of California, Davis · US

Funding

Correlating Human Electrophysiology and BOLD ActivityF32NS050067 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EKSTROM, ARNE D · 2005 to 2007
$139k
NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS050067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has become the dominant means of measuring behavior-related neural activity in the human brain. Yet the relation between the blood oxygen-level dependent (BOLD) signal and underlying neural activity remains an open and actively researched question. A widely accepted model, established for sensory neo-cortex, suggests that the BOLD signal reflects peri-synaptic activity in the form of the local field potential rather than the spiking rate of individual neurons. Several recent experimental results, however, suggest situations in which BOLD, spiking, and the local field potential dissociate. Two different models are discussed, based on the literature reviewed to account for this dissociation, a circuitry-based and vascular-based explanation. Both models are found to account for existing data under some testing situations and in certain brain regions. Because both the vascular and local circuitry-based explanations challenge the BOLD-LFP coupling model, these models provide guidance in predicting when BOLD can be expected to reflect neural processing and when the underlying relation with BOLD may be more complex than a direct correspondence.

Indexed as

BrainAction PotentialsCognitionElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOxygenOxygen

Identifiers

PMID20026191
PMCPMC3546820
OpenAlexW1974296586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.