Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20026097›Full record

ReviewClinical biochemistry2010

Identification of myocardial injury in the emergency setting.

Peter A Kavsak, Andrew Worster, John J You, Mark Oremus, Adell Elsharif, Stephen A Hill, P J Devereaux, Andrew R MacRae, Allan S Jaffe

Abstract readEvaluation StudyReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peter A KavsakDepartment of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. kavsakp@sympatico.ca
Andrew Worster
John J You
Mark Oremus
Adell Elsharif
Stephen A Hill
P J Devereaux
Andrew R MacRae
Allan S Jaffe

Funding

CIHR 94481
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the past decade, the use of biomarkers to detect myocardial injury in the emergency department (ED) has been given increasing prominence as evident by the numerous studies and guidelines documenting their use. This review details the scope of the clinical problem, the history of changes in the definition of myocardial infarction (MI) and the new approaches, as well as suggestions for using laboratory biomarkers in the early detection of MI in the ED.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularEmergency Service, HospitalEarly DiagnosisHeart InjuriesHumansMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumPoint-of-Care SystemsPractice Guidelines as Topic

Identifiers

PMID20026097
PMCPMC3569499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.