Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20025366›Full record

Trial reportPsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2009

What makes group MET work? A randomized controlled trial of college student drinkers in mandated alcohol diversion.

Heather LaChance, Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Angela D Bryan, Kent E Hutchison

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Alcohol interventions for mandated college students: A meta-analytic review.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Profiles of behavior change constructs for reducing alcohol use in women at risk of an alcohol-exposed pregnancy.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2018
    Trial
  6. Do As I Say: Using Communication Role-Plays to Assess Sexual Assertiveness Following an Intervention.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2016
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. The comparative effectiveness of individual and group brief motivational interventions for mandated college students.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2014
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Heather LaChanceNational Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Sarah W Feldstein Ewing
Angela D Bryan
Kent E Hutchison
Mind Research Network · USNational Jewish Health · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

STRESS INDUCED INCREASES IN ALCOHOL EFFECTSF31AA005561 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI MCGEARY, JOHN E · 2000 to 2002
$72k
Mediators and Moderators of a Brief Alcohol InterventionF31AA013222 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI LACHANCE, HEATHER R · 2001 to 2003
$62k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA005561NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA013222NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA05561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nationally, college drinkers exhibit the highest rates of alcohol consumption and represent the largest percentage of problem drinkers. Group motivational enhancement therapy (GMET) has been found to catalyze problem drinking reductions among college student samples. Although research supporting the use of single-session GMET in college samples (general and mandated) is emergent, no studies have evaluated a comprehensive model of the potential active ingredients of this group intervention. College students (N = 206; 88% White; 63% men; M age = 18.6) mandated to a university alcohol diversion program were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: the standard-of-care 2-session "Focus on Alcohol Concerns" education group (FAC), a single GMET, or a single alcohol information-only control group (AI) to evaluate the role of 5 putative mediators: readiness to change, self-efficacy, perceived risk, norm estimates, and positive drinking expectancies. At 3- and 6-month follow-ups, GMET students demonstrated greater reductions in problem drinking outcomes (drinks per drinking day, hazardous drinking symptoms, and alcohol-related problems). Of the 5 mediators proposed, only self-efficacy emerged as a significant mediator.

Indexed as

Health EducationProgram EvaluationAdolescentAlcoholismAnalysis of VarianceChi-Square DistributionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient SatisfactionPersonality InventoryPsychotherapy, GroupSelf EfficacyStudentsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID20025366
PMCPMC2802458
OpenAlexW2005936655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.