Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20025247›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2010

Mapping of the signal peptide-binding domain of Escherichia coli SecA using Förster resonance energy transfer.

Sarah M Auclair, Julia P Moses, Monika Musial-Siwek, Debra A Kendall, Donald B Oliver, Ishita Mukerji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Structure ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Alignment of the protein substrate hairpin along the SecA two-helix finger primes protein transport inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Emerging themes in SecA2-mediated protein export.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2012
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah M AuclairDepartment of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Molecular Biophysics Program, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459, USA.
Julia P Moses
Monika Musial-Siwek
Debra A Kendall
Donald B Oliver
Ishita Mukerji

Funding

REDESIGN OF STRUCTURAL REGIONS OF ALKALINE PHOSPHATASER01GM037639 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI KENDALL, DEBRA A · 1987 to 2011
$3.8M
Mechanism of Protein Localization in Eschericia coliR01GM042033 · NIGMS · WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY · PI OLIVER, DONALD B. · 1989 to 2010
$3.4M
DOCTORAL STUDIES IN MOLECULAR BIOPHYSICST32GM008271 · NIGMS · WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY · PI BEVERIDGE, DAVID LEWIS · 1988 to 2015
$1.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM37639NIGMS NIH HHS GM42033NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM037639NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM042033NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of the signal peptide-binding domain within SecA ATPase is an important goal for understanding the molecular basis of SecA preprotein recognition as well as elucidating the chemo-mechanical cycle of this nanomotor during protein translocation. In this study, Forster resonance energy transfer methodology was employed to map the location of the SecA signal peptide-binding domain using a collection of functional monocysteine SecA mutants and alkaline phosphatase signal peptides labeled with appropriate donor-acceptor fluorophores. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements yielded an equilibrium binding constant of 1.4 or 10.7 muM for the alkaline phosphatase signal peptide labeled at residue 22 or 2, respectively, with SecA, and a binding stoichiometry of one signal peptide bound per SecA monomer. Binding affinity measurements performed with a monomer-biased mutant indicate that the signal peptide binds equally well to SecA monomer or dimer. Distance measurements determined for 13 SecA mutants show that the SecA signal peptide-binding domain encompasses a portion of the preprotein cross-linking domain but also includes regions of nucleotide-binding domain 1 and particularly the helical scaffold domain. The identified region lies at a multidomain interface within the heart of SecA, surrounded by and potentially responsive to domains important for binding nucleotide, mature portions of the preprotein, and the SecYEG channel. Our FRET-mapped binding domain, in contrast to the domain identified by NMR spectroscopy, includes the two-helix finger that has been shown to interact with the preprotein during translocation and lies at the entrance to the protein-conducting channel in the recently determined SecA-SecYEG structure.

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferMembrane Transport ProteinsProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiarySecA ProteinsSEC Translocation ChannelsAdenosine TriphosphatasesBacterial ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsSecA ProteinsSEC Translocation Channels

Identifiers

PMID20025247
PMCPMC2850574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.