Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20024756›Full record

ArticleAIDS care2009

Can you hear me now? Limited use of technology among an urban HIV-infected cohort.

E Shacham, K Stamm, E T Overton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Barriers to using text message appointment reminders in an HIV clinic.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2014
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Technology Use Among Patients in a Nonurban Southern U.S. HIV Clinic in 2015.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

E ShachamDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. eshacham@wustl.edu
K Stamm
E T Overton

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences (UL1)UL1RR024992 · NCRR · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2007 to 2011
$45.4M
NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024992
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies support technology-based behavioral interventions for individuals with HIV. This study focused on the use of cell phone and internet technologies among a cohort of 515 HIV-infected individuals. Socio-demographic and clinic data were collected among individuals presenting at an urban Midwestern university HIV clinic in 2007. Regular internet usage occurred more often with males, Caucasians, those who were employed, had higher income, and were more educated. Higher levels of education and income >$10,000 predicted regular usage when controlling for race, employment, and gender. Cell phone ownership was associated with being Caucasian, employed, more educated, and salary >$10,000. Employment was the only predictor of owning a cell phone when controlling for income, race, and education. Individuals who were <40 years of age, employed, and more educated were more likely to know how to text message. Employment and post-high school education predicted knowledge of text messaging, when controlling for age. Disparities among internet, cell phone, and text messaging usage exist among HIV-infected individuals.

Indexed as

Black or African AmericanCell PhoneCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHIV InfectionsHousingHumansIncomeInternetMaleMarital StatusMissouriPatient ComplianceUrban HealthWhite People

Identifiers

PMID20024756
PMCPMC3686818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.