Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20024751›Full record

SynthesisAIDS care2009

A systematic review comparing antiretroviral adherence descriptive and intervention studies conducted in the USA.

Margarete Sandelowski, Corrine I Voils, Yunkyung Chang, Eun-Jeong Lee

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AIDS care, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margarete SandelowskiSchool of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA. msandelo@email.unc.edu
Corrine I Voils
Yunkyung Chang
Eun-Jeong Lee
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

INTERVENTIONS FOR PREVENTING &MANAGING CHRONIC ILLNESST32NR007091 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Cheryl L Giscombe, Cathi Barbra Propper · 1996 to 2026
$11.8M
Integrating Qualitative &Quantitative Research FindingsR01NR004907 · NINR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDELOWSKI, MARGARETE J · 2000 to 2009
$3.1M
NINR NIH HHS 5R01NR004907NINR NIH HHS R01 NR004907NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the extent to which studies aimed at testing interventions to improve antiretroviral adherence have targeted the facilitators of and barriers known to affect adherence. Of the 88 reports reviewed, 41 were reports of descriptive studies conducted with US HIV-positive women and 47 were reports of intervention studies conducted with US HIV-positive persons. We extracted from the descriptive studies all findings addressing any factor linked to antiretroviral adherence and from the intervention studies, information on the nature of the intervention, the adherence problem targeted, the persons targeted for the intervention, and the intervention outcomes desired. We discerned congruence between the prominence of substance abuse as a factor identified in the descriptive studies as a barrier to adherence and its prominence as the problem most addressed in those reports of intervention studies that specified the problems targeted for intervention. We also discerned congruence between the prominence of family and provider support as factors identified in the descriptive studies as facilitators of adherence and the presence of social support as an intervention component and outcome variable. Less discernible in the reports of intervention studies was specific attention to other factors prominent in the descriptive studies, which may be due to the complex nature of the problem, individualistic and rationalist slant of interventions, or simply the ways interventions were presented. Our review raises issues about niche standardization and intervention tailoring, targeting, and fidelity.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAnti-HIV AgentsEpidemiologic MethodsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleUnited StatesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID20024751
PMCPMC2797126
OpenAlexW2017452345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.