Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20024535›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010

The effect of long-term danazol prophylaxis on liver function in hereditary angioedema-a longitudinal study.

Henriette Farkas, Ibolya Czaller, Dorottya Csuka, Anikó Vas, Szilvia Valentin, Lilian Varga, Gábor Széplaki, László Jakab, George Füst, Zoltán Prohászka and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions for the long-term prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The International/Canadian hereditary angioedema guideline.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The International/Canadian Hereditary Angioedema Guideline.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2019
    Review
  11. Managing the female patient with hereditary angioedema.Women's health (London, England) · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian hereditary angioedema guideline.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2014
    Article
  15. WAO Guideline for the Management of Hereditary Angioedema.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Management of upper airway edema caused by hereditary angioedema.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2010
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Henriette FarkasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. farkash@kut.sote.hu
Ibolya Czaller
Dorottya Csuka
Anikó Vas
Szilvia Valentin
Lilian Varga
Gábor Széplaki
László Jakab
George Füst
Zoltán Prohászka
George Harmat
Beata Visy
István Karádi
Semmelweis University · HUHeim Pál Gyermekkórház · HUUniversity Clinical Centre · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDanazol is a drug most widely used for the prophylaxis of hereditary angioedema resulting from the deficiency of the C1-inhibitor. Potential hepatotoxic or liver tumor-inducing side effects of long-term danazol prophylaxis have been investigated during the follow-up of hereditary angioedema patients.

methodsCharacteristic parameters of liver function (including bilirubin, GOT, GPT, gammaGT, total protein, ALP, LDH), as well as findings of viral serology screens and abdominal ultrasonography-determined during years 0 and 5 of follow-up of patient groups taking/not taking danazol-have been reviewed and analyzed comparatively.

resultsFrom a population of 126 hereditary angioedema patients, 46 subjects taking danazol and another 46 not taking danazol fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Longitudinal follow-up did not reveal any clinically relevant difference between the liver function parameters determined in years 0 and 5 in the two groups. Abdominal ultrasound did not detect neoplastic or other potentially treatment-related alterations of the liver parenchyma. There were no discontinuations of treatment during the study.

conclusionsOur results clearly suggest that, administered at the lowest effective dose, danazol does not induce liver injury in hereditary angioedema patients.

Indexed as

Angioedemas, HereditaryAutoimmune Lymphoproliferative SyndromeComplement C1 Inactivator ProteinsComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinDanazolHumansLiver DiseasesLiver Function TestsLongitudinal StudiesComplement C1 Inactivator ProteinsComplement C1 Inhibitor ProteinDanazolSERPING1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID20024535
OpenAlexW2064587482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.