Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20023663›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2010

Shiga toxins--from cell biology to biomedical applications.

Ludger Johannes, Winfried Römer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 238 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
238citing papers in PubMed
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

238 citing papers in PubMed, 501 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Can Nature Overcome Invasive Gastrointestinal Infections?International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Skin microbiota and diabetic foot ulcers.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  18. Shiga Toxins Produced by EnterohaemorrhagicJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

178 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ludger JohannesInstitut Curie - Centre de Recherche and CNRS UMR144, Traffic, Signalling and Delivery Laboratory, 26 rue d'Ulm, 75248 Paris Cedex 05, France. ludger.johannes@curie.fr
Winfried Römer
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli is an emergent pathogen that can induce haemolytic uraemic syndrome. The toxin has received considerable attention not only from microbiologists but also in the field of cell biology, where it has become a powerful tool to study intracellular trafficking. In this Review, we summarize the Shiga toxin family members and their structures, receptors, trafficking pathways and cellular targets. We discuss how Shiga toxin affects cells not only by inhibiting protein biosynthesis but also through the induction of signalling cascades that lead to apoptosis. Finally, we discuss how Shiga toxins might be exploited in cancer therapy and immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Shiga ToxinsAnimalsAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateApoptosisCell MembraneHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliSignal TransductionAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateGb3 antigenShiga Toxins

Identifiers

PMID20023663
OpenAlexW2082661031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.