Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20023645›Full record

ArticleNature nanotechnology2010

Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient.

Meni Wanunu, Will Morrison, Yitzhak Rabin, Alexander Y Grosberg, Amit Meller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature nanotechnology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Single-Molecule Biodosimetry.Analytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meni WanunuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Will Morrison
Yitzhak Rabin
Alexander Y Grosberg
Amit Meller

Funding

High throughput DNA Sequencing using Design Polymers and Nanopore arraysR01HG004128 · NHGRI · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI MELLER, AMIT · 2006 to 2009
$2.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG-004128NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solid-state nanopores are sensors capable of analysing individual unlabelled DNA molecules in solution. Although the critical information obtained from nanopores (for example, DNA sequence) comes from the signal collected during DNA translocation, the throughput of the method is determined by the rate at which molecules arrive and thread into the pores. Here, we study the process of DNA capture into nanofabricated SiN pores of molecular dimensions. For fixed analyte concentrations we find an increase in capture rate as the DNA length increases from 800 to 8,000 base pairs, a length-independent capture rate for longer molecules, and increasing capture rates when ionic gradients are established across the pore. Furthermore, we show that application of a 20-fold salt gradient allows the detection of picomolar DNA concentrations at high throughput. The salt gradients enhance the electric field, focusing more molecules into the pore, thereby advancing the possibility of analysing unamplified DNA samples using nanopores.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDiffusionDNAElectrochemistryKineticsMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionModels, ChemicalNanostructuresNanotechnologyNucleic Acid ConformationParticle SizePorositySaltsSolutionsStatic ElectricityDNASaltsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID20023645
PMCPMC2849735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.