Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20023603›Full record

Trial reportSpine2010

The impact of workers' compensation on outcomes of surgical and nonoperative therapy for patients with a lumbar disc herniation: SPORT.

Steven J Atlas, Tor D Tosteson, Emily A Blood, Jonathan S Skinner, Glenn S Pransky, James N Weinstein

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Spine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A clinical model to predict postoperative improvement in sub-domains of the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score for degenerative cervical myelopathy.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steven J AtlasGeneral Medicine Division, Medical Services, MA General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Tor D Tosteson
Emily A Blood
Jonathan S Skinner
Glenn S Pransky
James N Weinstein

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Steven D Leach · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
UNDERSTANDING AND IMPROVING EPISODE-BASED HOSPITAL CAREP01AG019783 · NIA · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Alistair James O'MALLEY · 2001 to 2026
$52.9M
LOW BACK PAIN--A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIALU01AR045444 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WEINSTEIN, JAMES N · 1999 to 2013
$20.8M
Prognostic Value of Lumbar Spine MRIP60AR048094 · NIAMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI ATLAS, STEVEN J · 2003 to 2007
$6.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR048094NIAMS NIH HHS U01 AR045444NIAMS NIH HHS U01-AR45444NIA NIH HHS P01 AG019783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designProspective randomized and observational cohorts.

objectiveTo compare outcomes of patients with and without workers' compensation who had surgical and nonoperative treatment for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (IDH). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few studies have examined the association between worker's compensation and outcomes of surgical and nonoperative treatment.

methodsPatients with at least 6 weeks of sciatica and a lumbar IDH were enrolled in either a randomized trial or observational cohort at 13 US spine centers. Patients were categorized as workers' compensation or nonworkers' compensation based on baseline disability compensation and work status. Treatment was usual nonoperative care or surgical discectomy. Outcomes included pain, functional impairment, satisfaction and work/disability status at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

resultsCombining randomized and observational cohorts, 113 patients with workers' compensation and 811 patients without were followed for 2 years. There were significant improvements in pain, function, and satisfaction with both surgical and nonoperative treatment in both groups. In the nonworkers' compensation group, there was a clinically and statistically significant advantage for surgery at 3 months that remained significant at 2 years. However, in the workers' compensation group, the benefit of surgery diminished with time; at 2 years no significant advantage was seen for surgery in any outcome (treatment difference for SF-36 bodily pain [-5.9; 95% CI: -16.7-4.9] and physical function [5.0; 95% CI: -4.9-15]). Surgical treatment was not associated with better work or disability outcomes in either group.

conclusionPatients with a lumbar IDH improved substantially with both surgical and nonoperative treatment. However, there was no added benefit associated with surgical treatment for patients with workers' compensation at 2 years while those in the nonworkers' compensation group had significantly greater improvement with surgical treatment.

Indexed as

Disability EvaluationAdultCohort StudiesDiskectomyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntervertebral Disc DisplacementLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedMuscle Relaxants, CentralNarcoticsPatient SelectionProspective StudiesSciaticaMuscle Relaxants, CentralNarcotics

Identifiers

PMID20023603
PMCPMC2828633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.