Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20023093›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

High heterogeneity within methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates, defined by Cfr9I macrorestriction-pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profiles and spa and SCCmec types.

M A Argudín, A Fetsch, B-A Tenhagen, J A Hammerl, S Hertwig, J Kowall, M R Rodicio, A Käsbohrer, R Helmuth, A Schroeter and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Distribution of the Most PrevalentFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

M A ArgudínDepartmento de Biología Funcional (Area de Microbiología), University of Oviedo, Julían Clavería 6, E-33006 Oviedo, Spain,
A Fetsch
B-A Tenhagen
J A Hammerl
S Hertwig
J Kowall
M R Rodicio
A Käsbohrer
R Helmuth
A Schroeter
M C Mendoza
J Bräunig
B Appel
B Guerra

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During recent years, the animal-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clone ST398 has extensively been studied. The DNA of these isolates turned out to be refractory to SmaI restriction, and consequently, SmaI is unsuitable for subtyping this clone by standard pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Very recently, ST398 DNA was shown to be digested by Cfr9I, a neoschizomer of SmaI. In the present study, we employed Cfr9I PFGE on 100 German and 5 Dutch ST398 isolates and compared their PFGE profiles, protein A gene variable repeat regions (spa types), and types of the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). The isolates (from healthy carrier pigs, clinical samples from pigs, dust from farms, milk, and meat) were assigned to 35 profiles, which were correlated to the SCCmec type. A dendrogram with the Cfr9I patterns assigned all profiles to two clusters. Cluster A grouped nearly all isolates with SCCmec type V, and cluster B comprised all SCCmec type IVa and V* (a type V variant first identified as III) carriers plus one isolate with SCCmec type V. Both clusters also grouped methicillin-susceptible S. aureus isolates. The association of the majority of isolates with SCCmec type V in one large cluster indicated the presence of a successful subclone within the clonal complex CC398 from pigs, which has diversified. In general, the combination of Cfr9I PFGE with spa and SCCmec typing demonstrated the heterogeneity of the series analyzed and can be further used for outbreak investigations and traceability studies of the MRSA ST398 emerging clone.

Indexed as

Deoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesColony Count, MicrobialConjugation, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA FingerprintingGenes, BacterialGenotypeMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsSequence Analysis, DNASerotypingTandem Repeat SequencesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsCCCGGG-specific type II deoxyribonucleasesDeoxyribonucleases, Type II Site-SpecificDNA, BacterialVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID20023093
PMCPMC2813030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.