Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20022232›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2010

Discovery of the mitotic selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and its implications for vertebrate development.

A Armakolas, M Koutsilieris, A J S Klar

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Unbiased segregation of yeast chromatids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
  9. Unbiased segregation of fission yeast chromosome 2 strands to daughter cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Review
  10. Selective tracking of template DNA strands after induction of mitosis with unreplicated genomes (MUGs) in Drosophila S2 cells.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MADM gives new insights into gliomagenesis.Journal of molecular cell biology · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Far from solved: a perspective on what we know about early mechanisms of left-right asymmetry.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2010
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

A ArmakolasLaboratory of Experimental Physiology, Athens Medical School Mikras Asias 75, Athens 115 27, Greece. aarmakol@med.uoa.gr
M Koutsilieris
A J S Klar
Athens Medical Center · GRAthens State University · USFrederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research · US

Funding

Studies on SilencingZIABC010381 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KLAR, AMAR J · 2009 to 2016
$3.6M
Human Handedness Psychosis Etiology StudiesZIABC010386 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KLAR, AMAR J · 2009 to 2011
$1.0M
STUDIES ON SILENCINGZ01BC010381 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI KLAR, AMAR J · 2000 to 2008
$602k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010381
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The asymmetric cell division process is required for cellular differentiation and embryonic development. Recent evidence obtained in Drosophila and C. elegans suggest that this process occurs by non-equivalent distribution of proteins or mRNA (intrinsic factors) to daughter cells, or by their differential exposure to cell extrinsic factors. In contrast, haploid fission yeast sister cells developmentally differ by inheriting sister chromatids that are differentiated by epigenetic means. Specifically, the act of DNA replication at the mating-type locus in yeast switches it's alternate alleles only in one specific member of chromosome 2 sister chromatids in nearly every chromosome replication cycle. To employ this kind of mechanism for cellular differentiation, strictly based on Watson-Crick structure of DNA in diploid organism, selective segregation mechanism is required to coordinate distribution of potentially differentiated sister chromatids to daughter cells. Genetic evidence to this postulate was fortuitously provided by the analysis of mitotic recombinants of chromosome 7 in mouse cells. Remarkably, the biased segregation occurs in some cell types but not in others and the process seems to be chromosome-specific. This review summarizes the discovery of selective chromatid segregation phenomenon and it suggests that such a process of Somatic Sister chromatid Imprinting and Selective chromatid Segregation (SSIS model) might explain development in eukaryotes, such as that of the body axis left-right visceral organs laterality specification in mice.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationMitosisAnimalsBody PatterningCaenorhabditis elegansCell DifferentiationChromatidsDNA ReplicationDrosophila melanogasterDyneinsMiceSpindle ApparatusDyneins

Identifiers

PMID20022232
PMCPMC7241865
OpenAlexW1971734567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.