Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20022010›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2010

The mechanical effects of different levels of cement penetration at the cement-bone interface.

Daan Waanders, Dennis Janssen, Kenneth A Mann, Nico Verdonschot

Open access · bronzeAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. High congruency MB insert design: stabilizing knee joint even with PCL deficiency.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daan WaandersOrthopaedic Research Laboratory, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. d.waanders@orthop.umcn.nl
Dennis Janssen
Kenneth A Mann
Nico Verdonschot
Radboud University Medical Center · NLSUNY Upstate Medical University · USUniversity of Twente · NL

Funding

INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR01AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 2001 to 2021
$6.3M
INTERFACE FAILURE IN TOTAL JOINT REPLACEMENTSR29AR042017 · NIAMS · UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY · PI MANN, KENNETH A. · 1996 to 2000
$68k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR42017NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR042017NIAMS NIH HHS R29 AR042017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical effects of varying the depth of cement penetration in the cement-bone interface were investigated using finite element analysis (FEA) and validated using companion experimental data. Two FEA models of the cement-bone interface were created from micro-computed tomography data and the penetration of cement into the bone was varied over six levels each. The FEA models, consisting of the interdigitated cement-bone constructs with friction between cement and bone, were loaded to failure in tension and in shear. The cement and bone elements had provision for crack formation due to excessive stress. The interfacial strength showed a strong relationship with the average interdigitation (r(2)=0.97 and r(2)=0.93 in tension and shear, respectively). Also, the interface strength was strongly related with the contact area (r(2)=0.98 and r(2)=0.95 in tension and shear, respectively). The FEA results compared favorably to the stiffness-strength relationships determined experimentally. Overall, the cement-bone interface was 2.5 times stronger in shear than in tension and 1.15 times stiffer in tension than in shear, independent of the average interdigitation. More cracks occurred in the cement than in the bone, independent of the average interdigitation, consistent with the experimental results. In addition, more cracks were generated in shear than in tension. In conclusion, achieving and maintaining maximal infiltration of cement into the bone to obtain large interdigitation and contact area is key to optimizing the interfacial strength.

Indexed as

Bone CementsHip ProsthesisAlgorithmsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationEquipment Failure AnalysisFinite Element AnalysisHumansIn Vitro TechniquesMaterials TestingModels, BiologicalOsseointegrationProsthesis FailureShear StrengthTensile StrengthX-Ray MicrotomographyBone Cements

Identifiers

PMID20022010
PMCPMC2849873
OpenAlexW2111929895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.