Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20021671›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2009

Gene expression relationship between prostate cancer cells of Gleason 3, 4 and normal epithelial cells as revealed by cell type-specific transcriptomes.

Laura E Pascal, Ricardo Z N Vêncio, Laura S Page, Emily S Liebeskind, Christina P Shadle, Pamela Troisch, Bruz Marzolf, Lawrence D True, Leroy E Hood, Alvin Y Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Anterior GRadient (AGR) family proteins in epithelial ovarian cancer.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. WNT signalling in prostate cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura E PascalDepartment of Urology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA. pascalle@upmc.edu
Ricardo Z N Vêncio
Laura S Page
Emily S Liebeskind
Christina P Shadle
Pamela Troisch
Bruz Marzolf
Lawrence D True
Leroy E Hood
Alvin Y Liu
University of Washington · USSeattle University · USInstitute for Systems Biology · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Transmembrane Proteases and Prostate CarcinogenesisP01CA085859 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI VESSELLA, ROBERT LOUIS · 2002 to 2013
$21.2M
The Early Detection Research Network: Biomarker Developmental LaboratoriesU01CA111244 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2004 to 2015
$4.1M
Urologic Epithelial Stem CellsU01DK063630 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2002 to 2004
$2.4M
CD Expression in Prostate CancerR21CA098699 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LIU, ALVIN Y · 2003 to 2004
$301k
FDA HHS BP50-GMO-76547NCI NIH HHS CA111244NCI NIH HHS CA85859NCI NIH HHS CA98699NIDDK NIH HHS DK63630
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer cells in primary tumors have been typed CD10-/CD13-/CD24hi/CD26+/CD38lo/CD44-/CD104-. This CD phenotype suggests a lineage relationship between cancer cells and luminal cells. The Gleason grade of tumors is a descriptive of tumor glandular differentiation. Higher Gleason scores are associated with treatment failure.

methodsCD26+ cancer cells were isolated from Gleason 3+3 (G3) and Gleason 4+4 (G4) tumors by cell sorting, and their gene expression or transcriptome was determined by Affymetrix DNA array analysis. Dataset analysis was used to determine gene expression similarities and differences between G3 and G4 as well as to prostate cancer cell lines and histologically normal prostate luminal cells.

resultsThe G3 and G4 transcriptomes were compared to those of prostatic cell types of non-cancer, which included luminal, basal, stromal fibromuscular, and endothelial. A principal components analysis of the various transcriptome datasets indicated a closer relationship between luminal and G3 than luminal and G4. Dataset comparison also showed that the cancer transcriptomes differed substantially from those of prostate cancer cell lines.

conclusionsGenes differentially expressed in cancer are potential biomarkers for cancer detection, and those differentially expressed between G3 and G4 are potential biomarkers for disease stratification given that G4 cancer is associated with poor outcomes. Differentially expressed genes likely contribute to the prostate cancer phenotype and constitute the signatures of these particular cancer cell types.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCell Line, TumorEpithelial CellsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOrgan SpecificityProstatic NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID20021671
PMCPMC2809079
OpenAlexW2040847153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.