Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20021639›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2009

Combined effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309, and p53 expression on survival of breast cancer patients.

Marjanka K Schmidt, Johanna Tommiska, Annegien Broeks, Flora E van Leeuwen, Laura J Van't Veer, Paul D P Pharoah, Douglas F Easton, Mitul Shah, Manjeet Humphreys, Thilo Dörk and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. TP53 mutations and MDM2 polymorphisms in breast and ovarian cancers: amelioration by drugs and natural compounds.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Review
  8. Association of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The regulation of MDM2 oncogene and its impact on human cancers.Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Marjanka K SchmidtDepartments of Epidemiology, Experimental Therapy and Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands. mk.schmidt@nki.nl
Johanna Tommiska
Annegien Broeks
Flora E van Leeuwen
Laura J Van't Veer
Paul D P Pharoah
Douglas F Easton
Mitul Shah
Manjeet Humphreys
Thilo Dörk
Scarlett A Reincke
Rainer Fagerholm
Carl Blomqvist
Heli Nevanlinna
Helsinki University Hospital · FIThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 11022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSomatic inactivation of the TP53 gene in breast tumors is a marker for poor outcome, and breast cancer outcome might also be affected by germ-line variation in the TP53 gene or its regulators. We investigated the effects of the germ-line single nucleotide polymorphisms TP53 R72P (215G>C) and MDM2 SNP309 (-410T>G), and p53 protein expression in breast tumors on survival.

methodsWe pooled data from four breast cancer cohorts within the Breast Cancer Association Consortium for which both TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309 were genotyped and follow-up was available (n = 3,749). Overall and breast cancer-specific survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox's proportional hazards regression models.

resultsSurvival of patients did not differ by carriership of either germ-line variant, R72P (215G>C) or SNP309 (-410G>T) alone. Immunohistochemical p53 staining of the tumor was available for two cohorts (n = 1,109 patients). Survival was worse in patients with p53-positive tumors (n = 301) compared to patients with p53-negative tumors (n = 808); breast cancer-specific survival: HR 1.6 (95% CI 1.2 to 2.1), P = 0.001. Within the patient group with p53-negative tumors, TP53 rare homozygous (CC) carriers had a worse survival than G-allele (GG/GC) carriers; actuarial breast cancer-specific survival 71% versus 80%, P = 0.07; HR 1.8 (1.1 to 3.1), P = 0.03. We also found a differential effect of combinations of the two germ-line variants on overall survival; homozygous carriers of the G-allele in MDM2 had worse survival only within the group of TP53 C-allele carriers; actuarial overall survival (GG versus TT/TG) 64% versus 75%, P = 0.001; HR (GG versus TT) 1.5 (1.1 to 2.0), P = 0.01. We found no evidence for a differential effect of MDM2 SNP309 by p53 protein expression on survival.

conclusionsThe TP53 R72P variant may be an independent predictor for survival of patients with p53-negative tumors. The combined effect of TP53 R72P and MDM2 SNP309 on survival is in line with our a priori biologically-supported hypothesis, that is, the role of enhanced DNA repair function of the TP53 Pro-variant, combined with increased expression of the Mdm2 protein, and thus overall attenuation of the p53 pathway in the tumor cells.

Indexed as

Genes, p53AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGenotypeGerm-Line MutationHumansImmunohistochemistryMiddle AgedPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2Survival RateTumor Suppressor Protein p53MDM2 protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2TP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID20021639
PMCPMC2815553
OpenAlexW2079716113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.