ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2010
A modified Delorme's operation for the treatment of rectal mucosal prolapse.
Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rectal mucosal prolapse in males: surgery is effective for fecal incontinence but not for obstructed defecation.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Trial
- Safety and efficacy of Modified Delorme's procedure for rectal prolapse.Bioinformation · 2025Article
- Partial prolapsectomy and fixation proctomucopexy: a novel minimally invasive procedure.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Article
- Morphological alterations of the enteric nervous system in young male patients with rectal prolapse.International journal of colorectal disease · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsMany procedures have been described for the treatment of rectal internal mucosal prolapse (RMP), but the therapeutic effect is questionable. This work is to evaluate clinical and functional outcome of a modified Delorme's operation-trans-anal purse-string sutures for rectal mucosa and submucosa (TAS) for the treatment of RMP.
methodsThe clinical data of 58 patients with rectal mucosal prolapse treated with rectal mucosa and submucosal tissue (TAS) between June 2004 and June 2008 were analyzed retrospectively.
resultsNo patient died. Satisfaction with surgery was high in 48 cases (82.8%), moderate in seven (12.1%), and low in three (5.17%). Prolapse relapse rate was 5.17%. Anal tenesmus and urge to defecate resolved in 52 (89.7%) patients. Constipation improved in 25 of 28 (89.3%) previously constipated patients. No surgery-associated constipation occurred. The mean operative time was 31 (range 22-46) min. Mean hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-6). Mean patient follow-up was 32 months (range 12-60).
conclusionsFrom our data, TAS for the treatment of RMP showed encouraging results with little complications and an acceptable relapse rate. This economical procedure induces only mild trauma and is easy to perform, making it worthy of further practice and investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.