Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20020090›Full record

ArticleDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2010

[Clinical studies outside university clinics : What are the problems to implement this?].

U Zurbuchen, W Schwenk, R Bussar-Maatz, F Wichlas, H-J Buhr, J Neudecker, J-P Ritz

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. [Why nurses fly and surgeons rotate. The surgical study network CHIR-Net].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

U ZurbuchenKlinik für Allgemein-, Gefäss- und Thoraxchirurgie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Deutschland. urte.zurbuchen@charite.de
W Schwenk
R Bussar-Maatz
F Wichlas
H-J Buhr
J Neudecker
J-P Ritz
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEFranklin University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The demand for high quality evidence-based surgical treatment in Germany and awareness of the poor quality of surgical trials highlight the basic necessity of randomized controlled trials. In six surgical trial centers a professional infrastructure for surgical trials is in the process of being established since 2006.The aim is the initiation of surgical multicenter trials which can be effectively conducted by local networking. To accomplish a timely recruitment of patients it is necessary to integrate surgical departments outside university hospitals into multicenter trials. With a questionnaire survey of non-university surgical departments in the federal states of Berlin and Brandenburg, interest, experience in clinical trials and structural conditions in these departments were evaluated. Based on the results of this survey the possibilities to integrate non-university surgical departments into multicenter trials and how a high recruitment of patients can be motivated will be discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Hospitals, UniversityAcademies and InstitutesAttitude of Health PersonnelGermanyHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgery Department, Hospital

Identifiers

PMID20020090
OpenAlexW480077838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.