Trial reportAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2010
Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma.
Trial report in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 302 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Does Shared Decision-Making Improve Asthma Outcomes?
Does Shared Decision-Making Improve Adherence in Asthma
Who cites it
302 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Use of digital patient decision-support tools for atrial fibrillation treatments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ evidence-based medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of shared decision-making interventions for people living with chronic respiratory diseases.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluating home injection compared with healthcare-setting injection of somatostatin analogs: a systematic literature review.Endocrine · 2023Pooled it
- Quality assessment of clinical practice guidelines on psychological distress of cancer patients using the AGREE II instrument.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Quantitative Preferences for Lung Cancer Treatment from the Patients' Perspective: A Systematic Review.The patient · 2020Pooled it
- Quality of Stroke Patient Information Applied in Randomized Controlled Trials-Literature Review.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Pooled it
- "This illness diminishes me. What it does is like theft": A qualitative meta-synthesis of people's experiences of living with asthma.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Shared decision-making for people with asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Interventions to improve adherence to inhaled steroids for asthma.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC health services research · 2016Pooled it
- Impact of pharmacist-led intervention in medication adherence and inhaler usage on asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease control: a quasi-experimental study.BMC health services research · 2024Trial
- Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022Trial
- Effect of Shared Decision-Making for Stroke Prevention on Treatment Adherence and Safety Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Trial
- Impact of pharmacist-led educational interventions on asthma control and adherence: single-blind, randomised clinical trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2021Trial
- Decision aids to prepare patients for shared decision making: Two randomized controlled experiments on the impact of awareness of preference-sensitivity and personal motives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Group-randomized trial of tailored brief shared decision-making to improve asthma control in urban black adults.Journal of advanced nursing · 2021Trial
- Digital Communication Technology: Does Offering a Choice of Modality Improve Medication Adherence and Outcomes in a Persistent Asthma Population?The Permanente journal · 2020Trial
- A Simple Goal Elicitation Tool Improves Shared Decision Making in Outpatient Orthopedic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2020Trial
- Lay Health Coaching to Increase Appropriate Inhaler Use in COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Annals of family medicine · 2020Trial
- Asthma dissemination around patient-centered treatments in North Carolina (ADAPT-NC): a cluster randomized control trial evaluating dissemination of an evidence-based shared decision-making intervention for asthma management.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019Trial
242 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2010
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
rationalePoor adherence to asthma controller medications results in poor treatment outcomes.
objectivesTo compare controller medication adherence and clinical outcomes in 612 adults with poorly controlled asthma randomized to one of two different treatment decision-making models or to usual care.
methodsIn shared decision making (SDM), nonphysician clinicians and patients negotiated a treatment regimen that accommodated patient goals and preferences. In clinician decision making, treatment was prescribed without specifically eliciting patient goals/preferences. The otherwise identical intervention protocols both provided asthma education and involved two in-person and three brief phone encounters. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsRefill adherence was measured using continuous medication acquisition (CMA) indices-the total days' supply acquired per year divided by 365 days. Cumulative controller medication dose was measured in beclomethasone canister equivalents. In follow-up Year 1, compared with usual care, SDM resulted in: significantly better controller adherence (CMA, 0.67 vs. 0.46; P < 0.0001) and long-acting beta-agonist adherence (CMA, 0.51 vs. 0.40; P = 0.0225); higher cumulative controller medication dose (canister equivalent, 10.9 vs. 5.2; P < 0.0001); significantly better clinical outcomes (asthma-related quality of life, health care use, rescue medication use, asthma control, and lung function). In Year 2, compared with usual care, SDM resulted in significantly lower rescue medication use, the sole clinical outcome available for that year. Compared with clinician decision making, SDM resulted in: significantly better controller adherence (CMA, 0.67 vs. 0.59; P = 0.03) and long-acting beta-agonist adherence (CMA, 0.51 vs. 0.41; P = 0.0143); higher cumulative controller dose (CMA, 10.9 vs. 9.1; P = 0.005); and quantitatively, but not significantly, better outcomes on all clinical measures.
conclusionsNegotiating patients' treatment decisions significantly improves adherence to asthma pharmacotherapy and clinical outcomes. Clinical trials registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00217945 and NCT00149526).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.