Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20018266›Full record

ArticleVaccine2010

Differential ability of novel attenuated targeted deletion mutants of Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis strain SCHU S4 to protect mice against aerosol challenge with virulent bacteria: effects of host background and route of immunization.

J Wayne Conlan, Hua Shen, Igor Golovliov, Carl Zingmark, Petra C F Oyston, Wangxue Chen, Robert V House, Anders Sjöstedt

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Marmosets as models of infectious diseases.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Review
  3. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Vaccine-Mediated Mechanisms ControllingPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Guanylate-Binding Proteins Are Critical for Effective Control ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  13. AFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Adaptive Immunity toFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

J Wayne ConlanNational Research Council Canada, Institute for Biological Sciences, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0R6, Canada. wayne.conlan@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
Hua Shen
Igor Golovliov
Carl Zingmark
Petra C F Oyston
Wangxue Chen
Robert V House
Anders Sjöstedt
Umeå University · SENational Research Council Canada · CADefence Science and Technology Laboratory · GBInstitute for Biological Sciences · CA

Funding

Development of live Francisella tularensis vaccinesR01AI060689 · NIAID · UMEA UNIVERSITY · PI SJOSTEDT, ANDERS BO · 2005 to 2009
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS N01 AI050041NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI060689PHS HHS A160689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Francisella tularensis subspecies tularensis is a highly virulent facultative intracellular pathogen of humans and a potential biological weapon. A live vaccine strain, F. tularensis LVS, was developed more than 50 years ago by pragmatic attenuation of a strain of the less virulent holarctica subspecies. LVS was demonstrated to be highly effective in human volunteers who were exposed to intradermal challenge with fully virulent subsp. tularensis, but was less effective against aerosol exposure. LVS faces regulatory hurdles that to date have prevented its licensure for general use. Therefore, a better defined and more effective vaccine is being sought. To this end we have created gene deletion mutants in the virulent subsp. tularensis strain and tested them for their ability to elicit a protective immune response against systemic or aerosol challenge with the highly virulent wild-type subsp. tularensis strain, SCHU S4. Both oral and intradermal (ID) primary vaccination routes were assessed in BALB/c and C3H/HeN mice as was oral boosting. One SCHU S4 mutant missing the heat shock gene, clpB, was significantly more attenuated than LVS whereas a double deletion mutant missing genes FTT0918 and capB was as attenuated as LVS. In general mice immunized with SCHU S4DeltaclpB were significantly better protected against aerosol challenge than mice immunized with LVS. A single ID immunization of BALB/c mice with SCHU S4DeltaclpB was at least as effective as any other regimen examined. Mice immunized with SCHU S4Delta0918DeltacapB were generally protected to a similar degree as mice immunized with LVS. A preliminary examination of immune responses to vaccination with LVS, SCHU S4DeltaclpB, or SCHU S4Delta0918DeltacapB provided no obvious correlate to their relative efficacies.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAerosolsAnimalsBacterial VaccinesFemaleFrancisella tularensisImmunization, SecondaryInjections, IntradermalMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C3HSequence DeletionTularemiaVaccines, AttenuatedAerosolsBacterial VaccinesVaccines, Attenuated

Identifiers

PMID20018266
PMCPMC2822029
OpenAlexW1988839174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.