ArticleBMC proceedings2009
Power of selective genotyping in genome-wide association studies of quantitative traits.
Article in BMC proceedings, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trait-customized sampling of core collections from a winter wheat genebank collection supports association studies.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Association of genetic polymorphisms related to Johne's disease with estimated breeding values of Holstein sires for milk ELISA test scores.BMC veterinary research · 2020Article
- Genetic variants in the upstream region of activin receptor IIA are associated with female fertility in Japanese Black cattle.BMC genetics · 2015Article
- Identifying genetic risk variants for coronary heart disease in familial hypercholesterolemia: an extreme genetics approach.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2015Article
- Using genetic prediction from known complex disease Loci to guide the design of next-generation sequencing experiments.PloS one · 2013Article
- Using extreme phenotype sampling to identify the rare causal variants of quantitative traits in association studies.Genetic epidemiology · 2011Article
- A simple bias correction in linear regression for quantitative trait association under two-tail extreme selection.Behavior genetics · 2011Article
- Polymorphisms in Anopheles gambiae immune genes associated with natural resistance to Plasmodium falciparum.PLoS pathogens · 2010Article
- Genome-wide association analyses of quantitative traits: the GAW16 experience.Genetic epidemiology · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The selective genotyping approach in quantitative genetics means genotyping only individuals with extreme phenotypes. This approach is considered an efficient way to perform gene mapping, and can be applied in both linkage and association studies. Selective genotyping in association mapping of quantitative trait loci was proposed to increase the power of detecting rare alleles of large effect. However, using this approach, only common variants have been detected. Studies on selective genotyping have been limited to single-locus scenarios. In this study we aim to investigate the power of selective genotyping in a genome-wide association study scenario, and we specifically study the impact of minor allele frequency of variants on the power of this approach. We use the Genetic Analysis Workshop 16 rheumatoid arthritis whole-genome data from the North American Rheumatoid Arthritis Consortium. Two quantitative traits, anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide and rheumatoid factor immunoglobulin M, and one binary trait, rheumatoid arthritis affection status, are used in the analysis. The power of selective genotyping is explored as a function of three parameters: sampling proportion, minor allele frequency of single-nucleotide polymorphism, and test level. The results show that the selective genotyping approach is more efficient in detecting common variants than detecting rare variants, and it is efficient only when the level of declaring significance is not stringent. In summary, the selective genotyping approach is most suitable for detecting common variants in candidate gene-based studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.