Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20016990›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2010

Nicotinic receptor channelopathies and epilepsy.

Ortrud K Steinlein, Daniel Bertrand

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The role of dopamine signaling in epileptogenesis.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Pharmacogenetics of new analgesics.British journal of pharmacology · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neurocircuitry of the nicotinic cholinergic system.Dialogues in clinical neuroscience · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ortrud K SteinleinInstitute of Human Genetics, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany.
Daniel Bertrand

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterized by sudden episodes called seizures, epilepsy was recognized long ago as a neurological disorder that can have multiple forms ranging from benign to life threatening depending upon its severity. Although several evidences indicated that genes play an important role in at least half of the patients, it is only with the advances in molecular biology and genetics that the puzzle about oligogenic and monogenic epilepsies slowly starts to unfold. The finding of an association between a monogenic form of epilepsy and a mutation in the gene encoding the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit CHRNA4 marked, in 1995, a turning point in our understanding of epilepsy. It also marked the first step towards the today widely acknowledged concept of epilepsies as channelopathies. Several mutations in nicotinic acetylcholine receptor genes have, since then, been identified, and the functional properties of these mutated receptors were characterized. In this work, we review, in the light of the latest discoveries, the effects caused by the mutations on the physiological properties of the receptors and the impact of such mutations on neuronal network functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsChannelopathiesEpilepsyHumansIntellectual DisabilityMutationNeuronsReceptors, NicotinicSeizuresReceptors, Nicotinic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.