Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20015886›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2010

Efficacy of escalated imatinib combined with cytarabine in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

Wendy Deenik, Jeroen J W M Janssen, Bronno van der Holt, Gregor E G Verhoef, Willem M Smit, Marie José Kersten, Simon M G J Daenen, Leo F Verdonck, Augustin Ferrant, Anton V M B Schattenberg and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00028847 (A Dose-ranging Phase I/II Study of STI571 in Combination With Cytarabin in Patients With First Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00028847 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this map

A Dose-ranging Phase I/II Study of STI571 in Combination With Cytarabin in Patients With First Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorCommissie Voor Klinisch Toegepast OnderzoekRan2001Enrolled60ConditionsLeukemiaArmscytarabine, imatinib mesylate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Selecting the best frontline treatment in chronic myeloid leukemia.Current hematologic malignancy reports · 2015
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Wendy DeenikErasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J W M Janssen
Bronno van der Holt
Gregor E G Verhoef
Willem M Smit
Marie José Kersten
Simon M G J Daenen
Leo F Verdonck
Augustin Ferrant
Anton V M B Schattenberg
Pieter Sonneveld
Marinus van Marwijk Kooy
Shulamit Wittebol
Roelof Willemze
Pierre W Wijermans
H Berna Beverloo
Bob Löwenberg
Peter J M Valk
Gert J Ossenkoppele
Jan J Cornelissen
Erasmus MC · NLAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLHaga Hospital · NLIsala · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLMeander Medisch Centrum · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn order to improve the molecular response rate and prevent resistance to treatment, combination therapy with different dosages of imatinib and cytarabine was studied in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the HOVON-51 study. DESIGN AND

methodsHaving reported feasibility previously, we hereby report the efficacy of escalated imatinib (200 mg, 400 mg, 600 mg or 800 mg) in combination with two cycles of intravenous cytarabine (200 mg/m(2) or 1000 mg/m(2) days 1 to 7) in 162 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.

resultsWith a median follow-up of 55 months, the 5-year cumulative incidences of complete cytogenetic response, major molecular response, and complete molecular response were 89%, 71%, and 53%, respectively. A higher Sokal risk score was inversely associated with complete cytogenetic response (hazard ratio of 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.50-0.79, P<0.001). A higher dose of imatinib and a higher dose of cytarabine were associated with increased complete molecular response with hazard ratios of 1.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.68, P=0.07) and 1.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-2.72, P=0.04), respectively. Progression-free survival and overall survival rates at 5 years were 92% and 96%, respectively. Achieving a major molecular response at 1 year was associated with complete absence of progression and a probability of achieving a complete molecular response of 89%.

conclusionsThe addition of intravenous cytarabine to imatinib as upfront therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia is associated with a high rate of complete molecular responses (Clinicaltrials.Gov Identifier: NCT00028847).

Indexed as

AdultAgedBenzamidesCytarabineCytogenetic AnalysisDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImatinib MesylateLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveMaleMiddle AgedPiperazinesPyrimidinesBenzamidesCytarabineImatinib MesylatePiperazinesPyrimidines

Identifiers

PMID20015886
PMCPMC2878788
OpenAlexW2162662700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.