ArticleBMC cell biology2009
Analysis of replication factories in human cells by super-resolution light microscopy.
Article in BMC cell biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial mapping of DNA synthesis reveals dynamics and geometry of human replication nanostructures.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Insight into chromatin compaction and spatial organization in rice interphase nuclei.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Review
- Analysis of three-dimensional chromatin packing domains by chromatin scanning transmission electron microscopy (ChromSTEM).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A basal-level activity of ATR links replication fork surveillance and stress response.Molecular cell · 2021Article
- Super-resolution visualization and modeling of human chromosomal regions reveals cohesin-dependent loop structures.Genome biology · 2021Article
- Fiber-Like Organization as a Basic Principle for Euchromatin Higher-Order Structure.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Superresolution imaging reveals spatiotemporal propagation of human replication foci mediated by CTCF-organized chromatin structures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Single nucleosome imaging reveals loose genome chromatin networks via active RNA polymerase II.The Journal of cell biology · 2019Article
- Snapshots of archaeal DNA replication and repair in living cells using super-resolution imaging.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Correlative live and super-resolution imaging reveals the dynamic structure of replication domains.The Journal of cell biology · 2018Article
- The 10-nm chromatin fiber and its relationship to interphase chromosome organization.Biochemical Society transactions · 2018Review
- Superresolution imaging of individual replication forks reveals unexpected prodrug resistance mechanism.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018Article
- Spatiotemporal dynamics of HSV genome nuclear entry and compaction state transitions using bioorthogonal chemistry and super-resolution microscopy.PLoS pathogens · 2017Article
- Single-molecule fluorescence microscopy review: shedding new light on old problems.Bioscience reports · 2017Review
- A journey through the microscopic ages of DNA replication.Protoplasma · 2017Review
- Anatomy of Mammalian Replication Domains.Genes · 2017Review
- Probing the Spatial Organization of Molecular Complexes Using Triple-Pair-Correlation.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- 4D Visualization of replication foci in mammalian cells corresponding to individual replicons.Nature communications · 2016Article
- PCNA appears in two populations of slow and fast diffusion with a constant ratio throughout S-phase in replicating mammalian cells.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDNA replication in human cells is performed in discrete sub-nuclear locations known as replication foci or factories. These factories form in the nucleus during S phase and are sites of DNA synthesis and high local concentrations of enzymes required for chromatin replication. Why these structures are required, and how they are organised internally has yet to be identified. It has been difficult to analyse the structure of these factories as they are small in size and thus below the resolution limit of the standard confocal microscope. We have used stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, which improves on the resolving power of the confocal microscope, to probe the structure of these factories at sub-diffraction limit resolution.
resultsUsing immunofluorescent imaging of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and RPA (replication protein A) we show that factories are smaller in size (approximately 150 nm diameter), and greater in number (up to 1400 in an early S- phase nucleus), than is determined by confocal imaging. The replication inhibitor hydroxyurea caused an approximately 40% reduction in number and a 30% increase in diameter of replication factories, changes that were not clearly identified by standard confocal imaging.
conclusionsThese measurements for replication factory size now approach the dimensions suggested by electron microscopy. This agreement between these two methods, that use very different sample preparation and imaging conditions, suggests that we have arrived at a true measurement for the size of these structures. The number of individual factories present in a single nucleus that we measure using this system is greater than has been previously reported. This analysis therefore suggests that each replication factory contains fewer active replication forks than previously envisaged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.