Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20014904›Full record

ReviewExpert review of anti-infective therapy2010

Use of vancomycin pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic properties in the treatment of MRSA infections.

Christopher Giuliano, Christopher Giulano, Krystal K Haase, Ronald Hall

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of anti-infective therapy, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Development of an on-site therapeutic drug monitoring method using a portable spectrometer.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
    Giulano, Christopher [corrected to Giuliano, Christopher]
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christopher GiulianoTexas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 1300 Coulter, Suite 203, Amarillo, TX 79106, USA. christopher.giuliano@ttuhsc.edu
Christopher Giulano
Krystal K Haase
Ronald Hall

Funding

North and Central Texas Clinical and Translational Science Initiative (KL2)KL2RR024983 · NCRR · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2007 to 2011
$4.3M
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024983NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR024983
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vancomycin is a commonly used antimicrobial in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Increasing vancomycin MIC values in MRSA clinical isolates makes the optimization of vancomycin dosing pivotal to its continued use. Unfortunately, limited data exist regarding the optimal pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) goal to improve bacterial killing and clinical outcomes with vancomycin. The hallmark study in this area suggests that achieving an AUC to MIC ratio of over 400 improves the likelihood of achieving these outcomes. Challenges in the implementation of PK-PD-based dosing for vancomycin include current methodologies utilized in microbiology laboratories, as well as intra- and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. Individualized dosing based on MIC and specific patient factors is important to achieve optimal outcomes from vancomycin therapy.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHumansMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsStaphylococcal InfectionsVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID20014904
PMCPMC2877625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.