Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013333›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2010

[Medicinal therapy for interventional surgery of the peripheral vascular system].

J Tacke, E Lindhoff-Last

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 95% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J TackeInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie/Neuroradiologie, Klinikum Passau, Innstr. 76, 94032 Passau, Deutschland. Josef.Tacke@klinikum-passau.de
E Lindhoff-Last
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinikum Passau · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of medicinal treatment, during and after femoral and crural interventions is to prevent early or late onset arterial thrombosis of the treated vascular segments. Therefore, unfractionated heparin is administered during the intervention by an intra-arterial or intravenous approach. To avoid late onset thrombosis, administration of platelet function inhibitors is recommended. However, valid data are only available for acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Therefore, ASA is recommended for long term medication. In several cardiological studies on stent implantation in coronary vessels the combination of ASA and clopidogrel for dual platelet inhibition has been proven to be effective. These results have been transferred to antithrombotic therapy of the lower extremities despite the lack of dedicated studies. There is no evidence for the use of vitamin K antagonists after peripheral interventions.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAnticoagulantsArterial Occlusive DiseasesAspirinClopidogrelDrug Therapy, CombinationHeparinHumansInfusions, IntravenousIschemiaLegLong-Term CarePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSecondary PreventionThrombocytopeniaAnticoagulantsAspirinClopidogrelHeparinPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTiclopidineVitamin K

Identifiers

PMID20013333
OpenAlexW1537525661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.