Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013318›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2010

Protective effects of propolis and related polyphenolic/flavonoid compounds against toxicity induced by irinotecan.

Nada Oršolić, Vesna Benković, Duje Lisičić, Domagoj Dikić, Julija Erhardt, Anica Horvat Knežević

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Understanding the Anticancer Properties of Honey.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Investigation of the Possible Protective Effect ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. An Insight into Anticancer Effect of Propolis and Its Constituents: A Review of Molecular Mechanisms.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Induced Cell Death as a Possible Pathway of Antimutagenic Action.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Effects of propolis on warfarin efficacy.Kardiochirurgia i torakochirurgia polska = Polish journal of cardio-thoracic surgery · 2017
    Article
  19. Quercetin and hyperthermia modulate cisplatin-induced DNA damage in tumor and normal tissues in vivo.Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nada OršolićDepartment of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Rooseveltov trg 6, Zagreb, 10000, Croatia. norsolic@yahoo.com
Vesna Benković
Duje Lisičić
Domagoj Dikić
Julija Erhardt
Anica Horvat Knežević
University of Zagreb · HR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the excellent chemotherapeutic effect of irinotecan, its cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in normal cells remains a major problem in chemotherapy. This study was carried out to find whether propolis preparations and related flavonoids (quercetin, naringin) might enhance irinotecan-induced cytotoxicity to tumor cells in mice bearing Ehrlich ascites tumors (EAT) while protecting normal blood, liver, and kidney cells. The preparation of propolis and their flavonoids were given to mice intraperitoneally at a dose of 100 mg kg(-1) body weight for three consecutive days before the ip injection of EAT cells (2×10(6)). Irinotecan was administered ip at dose of 50 mg kg(-1) on days 3, 4, and 5 after tumor cell inoculation. The combination treatment resulted in substantial inhibition of the growth of EAT cells as well as treatment with quercetin or irinotecan alone, whereas other treatment by itself showed little effect. However, when mice were pre-treated with test components prior to irinotecan, the frequencies of irinotecan-induced micronuclei (MN) was decreased but in mice bearing tumor QU and EEP increased number of micronucleated cells. Propolis preparation and related flavonoids were found to exhibit an important immunomodulatory effect and could decrease irinotecan-induced toxic and genotoxic effects to normal cells without effecting irinotecan cytotoxicity in EAT cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBlood CellsCamptothecinCarcinoma, Ehrlich TumorCells, CulturedFlavonoidsImmunologic FactorsInjections, IntraperitonealIrinotecanKidneyLiverMacrophages, PeritonealMaleMiceMicronucleus TestsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinFlavonoidsImmunologic FactorsIrinotecanPhenolsPropolis

Identifiers

PMID20013318
OpenAlexW1964875797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.