Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013257›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2010

Pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients with and without extended dialysis.

Stefanie Swoboda, Michael C Ober, Christoph Lichtenstern, Soundos Saleh, Vedat Schwenger, Hans-Günther Sonntag, Walter Emil Haefeli, Georg Hempel, Torsten Hoppe-Tichy, Markus A Weigand

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pharmacology of emerging drugs for the treatment of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Determining therapeutic trough ranges for linezolid.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie SwobodaPharmacy Department, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Germany. stefanie.swoboda@med.uni-heidelberg.de
Michael C Ober
Christoph Lichtenstern
Soundos Saleh
Vedat Schwenger
Hans-Günther Sonntag
Walter Emil Haefeli
Georg Hempel
Torsten Hoppe-Tichy
Markus A Weigand
Heidelberg University · DEUniversity of Münster · DEInstitute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLinezolid is an option for the treatment of infections caused by multiresistant Gram-positive bacteria. The survival of critically ill patients with acute renal failure (ARF) can be improved by increasing the dose of renal replacement therapy. Extended (daily) dialysis (ED) is a new and important approach to renal replacement therapy in intensive care units. The aim of the study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in septic patients without ED and on ED, respectively.

methodsWe studied the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in adult intensive care patients with sepsis (n = 5) and anuric septic patients with ARF being treated with ED (n = 10). Linezolid 600 mg was administered intravenously twice daily. The pharmacokinetic parameters, their variability, and possible covariates were analyzed using NONMEM.

resultsThe pharmacokinetics of linezolid followed a two-compartment model with clearance (Cl) = 0.159 L h(-1) kg(-1) +/- 51% (population mean +/- interindividual variability), central volume of distribution (V(1)) = 0.273 L/kg +/- 21%, intercompartmental clearance (Q) = 0.369 L h(-1) kg(-1), and peripheral volume of distribution (V(2)) = 0.271 L/kg. The clearance in ED patients while on dialysis was increased by 3.5 L/h, and patients with liver transplantation/resection had their clearance reduced by 60%. Intra-individual variability was much smaller than inter-individual variability.

conclusionsOur results suggest that linezolid pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with ARF undergoing ED is not comparable to that in healthy subjects and patients without ARF. The best method of managing linezolid dosage in such a complex group of patients, whose physiology can vary daily, would be to use therapeutic drug monitoring.

Indexed as

AcetamidesAcute Kidney InjuryAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCritical CareDrug MonitoringFemaleHepatectomyHumansInfusions, IntravenousLinezolidLiver TransplantationMaleMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalAcetamidesAnti-Infective AgentsLinezolidOxazolidinones

Identifiers

PMID20013257
OpenAlexW2050544968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.