ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2010
[Giant congenital naevus : Indications and techniques for surgical treatment].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to current knowledge the term giant congenital naevus is generally applied to skin alterations which consist of naevus cells, that are already conspicuous at birth and reach a diameter of at least 20 cm or more in adulthood. Surgical removal of such alterations is fundamentally indicated because there is high potential for degeneration. The surgical challenge is the functional and aesthetic reconstruction after removal. This article presents the incidence, natural course and pathology of such giant congenital naevus alterations. The advantages and disadvantages of various reconstruction procedures are presented together with an algorithm for management of these potentially malignant alterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20013252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.