Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013122›Full record

ReviewDer Pathologe2010

[Grayzone lymphoma. Clinical relevance].

S Hartmann, M L Hansmann

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Pathologe, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

S HartmannSenckenbergisches Institut für Pathologie, Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
M L Hansmann

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant lymphomas are classified into different entities according to their morphology, immunohistochemical parameters and clinical behavior. Several important pathogenetic events can be assigned to certain lymphoma entity types. Nevertheless, some cases present overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical characteristics and a clear-cut diagnosis cannot be made. This is particularly the case with aggressive lymphomas for which a clear distinction cannot be made between the entities of diffuse large cell lymphoma/Burkitt lymphoma or primary mediastinal B cell lymphoma/classic Hodgkin's lymphoma. In order to redress this situation, two new gray zone entities were introduced in the WHO 2008 classification. Until further knowledge regarding the therapy, behavior and prognosis of these gray zone lymphomas has been gained, they should continue to be considered as distinct entities.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorB-LymphocytesBurkitt LymphomaDiagnosis, DifferentialDNA Mutational AnalysisHodgkin DiseaseHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesLymphomaLymphoma, B-CellLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMediastinal NeoplasmsMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-DerivedAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorRituximab

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.