Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013114›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2010

Modulation of prepulse inhibition through both M(1) and M (4) muscarinic receptors in mice.

Morgane Thomsen, Jürgen Wess, Brian S Fulton, Anders Fink-Jensen, S Barak Caine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Selective modulation of murine intestinal MAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Positive allosteric modulation of MNeuropharmacology · 2018
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Effects of muscarinic MPsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The muscarinic acetylcholine receptor agonist BuTAC mediates antipsychotic-like effects via the M4 subtype.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Morgane ThomsenAlcohol and Drug Abuse Research Center, McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA 02478, USA. mthomsen@mclean.harvard.edu
Jürgen Wess
Brian S Fulton
Anders Fink-Jensen
S Barak Caine
McLean Hospital · USHarvard University · USNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases · USUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes: physiological rolesZIADK075020 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI WESS, JURGEN · 2009 to 2025
$6.1M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DK075020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleMuscarinic cholinergic M(1) and M(4) receptors may participate in schizophrenia's etiology and have been proposed as targets for antipsychotic medications.

objectiveHere, we investigated the involvement of these receptors in behavioral measures pertinent to schizophrenia using knockout mice lacking M(1) receptors (M(1)-/-), M(4) receptors (M(4)-/-), or both (M(1)-/-M(4)-/-).

methodsWe measured prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle without drugs and after treatment with scopolamine (0.32-1.8 mg/kg), xanomeline (3.2 mg/kg), oxotremorine (0.032-0.1 mg/kg), clozapine (1.0-5.6 mg/kg), or haloperidol (0.32-3.2 mg/kg).

resultsIn female (but not male) mice, combined deletion of both M(1) and M(4) receptors decreased PPI relative to wild-type mice, while knockout of either receptor alone had no significant effect. Scopolamine disrupted PPI in wild-type and M(4)-/- mice, but not in female M(1)-/-M(4)-/- or female M(1)-/- mice. When administered before scopolamine, xanomeline restored PPI in wild-type mice and M(1)-/- mice, but not in M(4)-/- mice. In contrast, pretreatment with oxotremorine increased PPI regardless of genotype. Effects of clozapine and haloperidol on PPI were not hindered by either mutation.

conclusionsDeletion of both M(1) and M(4) receptors can disrupt PPI, suggesting that (at least partially redundant) M(1) and M(4) receptor-dependent functions are involved in sensorimotor gating mechanisms. PPI-disrupting effects of muscarinic antagonists appeared dependent upon M(1) receptor blockade. Our data also suggest that xanomeline exerts antipsychotic-like effects mainly through M(4) receptor stimulation, while stimulation of non-M(1)/M(4) subtypes may also have antipsychotic potential. Finally, our results do not support a role of M(1)/M(4) receptors in mediating antipsychotic-like effects of clozapine.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntipsychotic AgentsBehavior, AnimalClozapineFemaleHaloperidolMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsOxotremorinePyridinesReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptor, Muscarinic M4Reflex, StartleAntipsychotic AgentsClozapineHaloperidolMuscarinic AgonistsMuscarinic AntagonistsOxotremorinePyridinesReceptor, Muscarinic M1Receptor, Muscarinic M4ScopolamineThiadiazolesxanomeline

Identifiers

PMID20013114
PMCPMC3895331
OpenAlexW363341217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.