Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20013016›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2010

Factors related to survival and treatment success in invasive candidiasis or candidemia: a pooled analysis of two large, prospective, micafungin trials.

D L Horn, L Ostrosky-Zeichner, M I Morris, A J Ullmann, C Wu, D N Buell, L L Kovanda, O A Cornely

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00106288 (A Multicenter, Double Blind, Comparative, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Micafungin), which is not on this map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00106288 phase3completednot on this map

A Multicenter, Double Blind, Comparative, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Micafungin (FK463) Versus Liposomal Amphotericin B (AmBisome) in the Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis and Candidemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorAstellas Pharma IncRan2003 to 2005Enrolled637ConditionsCandidiasisArmsMicafungin, Liposomal Amphotericin B
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Molecular Investigation of the Fatal BloodstreamInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analyzing candidemia guideline adherence identifies opportunities for antifungal stewardship.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "De-escalation" strategy using micafungin for the treatment of systemicClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

D L HornClinical Research, Division of Infectious Diseases, Thomas Jefferson University, Suite 210, 211 South 9th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA. david.horn@jefferson.edu
L Ostrosky-Zeichner
M I Morris
A J Ullmann
C Wu
D N Buell
L L Kovanda
O A Cornely
Center for Global Development · USAstellas Pharma (United States) · USDominion (United States) · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crude and attributable mortality rates in patients with candidemia and invasive candidiasis remain unacceptably high. It is important to reach a more complete understanding of the risk factors underlying poor outcomes in patients with invasive Candida infections. Micafungin therapy has been assessed in two phase 3 trials compared to either liposomal amphotericin B or caspofungin. The availability of this large dataset allows the analyses of non-drug factors associated with survival and treatment success. A multivariate regression analysis was performed on data from the two trials separately and as a pooled analysis (N = 1,070). Analysis outcomes were survival at 42 days post-initiation of therapy and treatment success. For the pooled analysis, treatment success was significantly more likely for candidemia than invasive candidiasis. Both survival and treatment success were significantly less likely for the non-removal of catheter versus removal, Asian-Indians versus Caucasians, APACHE II score >20 to <or=30 and >30 versus <or=20, age >or=70 years versus <50 years, baseline corticosteroids, and persistent neutropenia. Survival was also significantly less likely for treatment in other regions versus North America and for patients with renal failure at baseline. These findings help to define non-antifungal drug factors that may impact survival and treatment success in invasive candidiasis or candidemia.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAPACHECandidiasisCatheterizationEchinocandinsFemaleFungemiaHumansLipopeptidesMaleMicafunginAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsEchinocandinsLipopeptidesliposomal amphotericin BMicafungin

Identifiers

PMID20013016
OpenAlexW1982722510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.