Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012990›Full record

ReviewParasitology research2010

Artemisinin derivatives for treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Sudan: too early for too much hope.

Hayder A Giha

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology research, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hayder A GihaDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University (AGU), P.O. Box 26671, Manama, Bahrain. hayderag@agu.edu.bh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is adopted by several countries as first line for malaria treatment in the last decade. Concomitantly, the World Health Organization and other research reports showed a dramatic decline in malaria burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and treatment failure (TF). The optimistic features of ACT are regularly reported with great hopes, while the pessimistic facets either not existing or underreported. However, the dependence on ACT as a single chemotherapeutic agent for malaria control bears considerable risks. Occurrence and spread of artemisinin derivatives (AD) TF will be a major threat, whether it is due to parasite drug resistance or use of poor drug quality. In addition, the safety of AD is not yet fully known. In this short review, two clinical trials performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD, dihydroartemisinin (DHA) plus chloroquine and artesunate (AS) plus fansidar, in Sudan are critically discussed. The conclusions from both studies were that, the TF rate of DHA indicates arrival of counterfeit AD to Africa, and both rate of TF and undesirable effects of AS/SP were recognized. Both findings indicate that it is too early for too much hope on AD.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsArtesunateChloroquineDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansMalaria, FalciparumPyrimethamineSudanSulfadoxineTreatment FailureAntimalarialsArtemisininsartenimolArtesunateChloroquineDrug Combinationsfanasil, pyrimethamine drug combinationPyrimethamineSulfadoxine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.