Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012507›Full record

Trial reportObesity surgery2010

Reinforcing the staple line during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: prospective randomized clinical study comparing three different techniques.

Giovanni Dapri, Guy Bernard Cadière, Jacques Himpens

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obesity surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 234 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. A systematic review of staple-line reinforcement in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Giovanni DapriDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, European School of Laparoscopic Surgery, Saint-Pierre University Hospital, Rue Haute, Brussels, Belgium. giovanni@dapri.net
Guy Bernard Cadière
Jacques Himpens
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGastric leak and hemorrhage are the most important challenges after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). In order to reduce these complications, the staple line can be reinforced by absorbable sutures or by the use of glycolide trimethylene carbonate copolymer onto the linear stapler (Gore Seamguard; W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, AZ). To our knowledge, there are no randomized studies showing the utility of staple line reinforcement during LSG. The purpose of this study was to randomly compare three techniques in LSG: no staple line reinforcement (group 1), buttressing of the staple line with Gore Seamguard (group 2), and staple line suturing (group 3).

methodsBetween January 2008 and February 2009, 75 patients were prospectively and randomly enrolled in the three different techniques of handling the staple line during LSG. The patient groups were similar (NS).

resultsMean operative time to perform the stomach sectioning was 15.9 +/- 5.9 min (group 1), 20.8 +/- 8.1 min (group 2), and 30.8 +/- 10.1 min (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total operative time was 47.4 +/- 10.7 min (group 1), 48.9 +/- 18.4 min (group 2), and 59.9 +/- 19.6 min (group 3) (p = 0.02). Mean blood loss during stomach sectioning was 19.5 +/- 21.3 mL (group 1), 3.6 +/- 4.7 mL (group 2), and 16.7 +/- 23.5 mL (group 3) (p < 0.001). Mean total blood loss was 48.9 +/- 67.1 mL (group 1), 32.5 +/- 46.5 mL (group 2), and 61.9 +/- 69.4 mL (group 3) (p = 0.03). Mean number of stapler cartridges used was 5.6 +/- 0.7 (group 1), 5.7 +/- 0.7 (group 2), and 5.8 +/- 0.6 (group 3) (NS). Postoperative leak affected one patient (group 1), two patients (group 2), and one patient (group 3) (NS). Mean hospital stay was 3.6 +/- 1.4 days (group 1), 3.9 +/- 1.5 days (group 2), and 2.8 +/- 0.8 days (group 3) (p = 0.01).

conclusionsIn LSG, buttressing the staple line with Gore Seamguard statistically reduces blood loss during stomach sectioning as well as overall blood loss. No staple line reinforcement statistically decreases the time to perform stomach sectioning and the total operative time. No significant difference is evidenced in terms of postoperative leak between the three techniques of LSG.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidProspective StudiesSurgical StaplingSuture Techniques

Identifiers

PMID20012507
OpenAlexW2081733304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.