Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012366›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2010

Molecular analysis of Candida albicans isolates from clinical specimens.

Melahat Gurbuz, Ilknur Kaleli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mating type and genotyping ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Profuse diversity and acidogenicity of theJournal of oral microbiology · 2021
    Article
  4. Genotype Analysis of ClinicalInfection and drug resistance · 2019
    Article
  5. Enterogenous infection ofWorld journal of emergency medicine · 2016
    Article
  6. Evolution and Application of Inteins inFrontiers in microbiology · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Melahat GurbuzDepartment of Microbiology and Clinical Microbiology, School of Medicine, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey. drmelahatgrbz@hotmail.com
Ilknur Kaleli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to genotype Candida albicans strains isolated from various clinical specimens by using CA-INT-R and CA-INT-L primer pairs designed to span the region that includes the site of the transposable group-1 intron in the 25S rRNA gene. A total of 194 C. albicans isolates (28 invasive and 166 noninvasive) were genotyped. The frequencies of genotypes A, B, C and D were found as 51.0, 29.4, 19.1 and 0.5%, respectively. Statistically significant difference was determined between frequency of genotype distribution between invasive and noninvasive isolates (P < 0.001). Genotype C was more prevalent among invasive isolates while genotype A was in noninvasive ones. Furthermore, six different subtypes were determined among genotype A C. albicans isolates by restriction endonuclease analysis using a previously constructed differentiation scheme consisting of HaeIII and MspI digestions. This study demonstrated the genetic diversity of clinical isolates of C. albicans in our hospital.

Indexed as

DNA FingerprintingMycological Typing TechniquesPolymorphism, GeneticCandida albicansCandidiasisDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalGenotypeHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, RibosomalDNA, FungalDNA PrimersDNA, RibosomalRNA, RibosomalRNA, ribosomal, 25S

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.