Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20012355›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research and treatment2010

Gene expression pathway analysis to predict response to neoadjuvant docetaxel and capecitabine for breast cancer.

Larissa A Korde, Lara Lusa, Lisa McShane, Peter F Lebowitz, LuAnne Lukes, Kevin Camphausen, Joel S Parker, Sandra M Swain, Kent Hunter, Jo Anne Zujewski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00005908 (A Pilot Trial of Sequential Primary), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00005908 phase2completednot on this map

A Pilot Trial of Sequential Primary (Neoadjuvant) Combination Chemotherapy With Docetaxel/Capecitabine (TX) and Doxorubicin/Cyclophosphamide (AC) in Primary Breast Cancer With Evaluation of Chemotherapy Effects on Gene Expression

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Ran2000 to 2008Enrolled30ConditionsBreast Cancer, Breast NeoplasmArmsDocetaxel - Dose A, Anastrozole, cyclophosphamide, Docetaxel - Dose B, Doxorubicin hydrochloride
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Larissa A KordeDivision of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, G3639, 825 Eastlake Ave, E, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. lkorde@u.washington.edu
Lara Lusa
Lisa McShane
Peter F Lebowitz
LuAnne Lukes
Kevin Camphausen
Joel S Parker
Sandra M Swain
Kent Hunter
Jo Anne Zujewski

Funding

Genetic Modifiers of Intitiation and Progression of Mammary CancerZIABC011255 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI HUNTER, KENT WILLIAM · 2010 to 2025
$33.2M
Adjuvant Therapy of Breast CancerZ01BC010560 · NCI · BASIC SCIENCES · PI SWAIN, SANDRA M · 2004 to 2007
$122k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to be equivalent to post-operative treatment for breast cancer, and allows for assessment of chemotherapy response. In a pilot trial of docetaxel (T) and capecitabine (X) neoadjuvant chemotherapy for Stage II/III BC, we assessed correlation between baseline gene expression and tumor response to treatment, and examined changes in gene expression associated with treatment. Patients received four cycles of TX. Tumor tissue obtained from Mammotome core biopsies pretreatment (BL) and post-cycle 1 (C1) of TX was FLash frozen and stored at -70 degrees C until processing. Gene expression analysis utilized Affymetrix HG-U133 Plus 2.0 GeneChip arrays. Statistical analysis was performed using BRB Array Tools after RMA normalization. Gene ontology (GO) pathway analysis used random variance t tests with a significance level of P\0.005. For gene categories identified byGO pathway analysis as significant, expression levels of individual genes within those pathways were compared between classes using univariate t tests; those genes with significance level of P\0.05 were reported. PAM50 analyses were performed on tumor samples to investigate biologic subtype and risk of relapse (ROR). Using GO pathway analysis, 39 gene categories discriminated between responders and non-responders,most notably genes involved in microtubule assembly and regulation. When comparing pre- and post-chemotherapy specimens, we identified 71 differentially expressed gene categories, including DNA repair and cell proliferation regulation. There were 45 GO pathways in which the change in expression after one cycle of chemotherapy was significantly different among responders and nonresponders. The majority of tumor samples fell into the basal like and luminal B categories. ROR scores decreased in response to chemotherapy; this change was more evident in samples from patients classified as responders by clinical criteria. GO pathway analysis identified a number of gene categories pertinent to therapeutic response, and may be an informative method for identifying genes important in response to chemotherapy. Larger studies using the methods described here are necessary to fully evaluate gene expression changes in response to chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCapecitabineCluster AnalysisDeoxycytidineDocetaxelDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFluorouracilGene ExpressionHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPilot ProjectsTaxoidsCapecitabineDeoxycytidineDocetaxelFluorouracilTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID20012355
PMCPMC5892182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.